A “pandemic of the unvaccinated” was in fact a pandemic of the newly penetrated, with an "echo pandemic" from the same source still proceeding unmolested

"Breakthrough infection" seems like ten years and thousands of government-propaganda terms ago

A huge and infrequently cited part of the covid scam was the pretense that two distinct mRNA shots administered 21 days (Pfizer/BioNTech) or 28 days (Moderna) apart were required for complete protection from contracting, spreading, and getting ill from the coronavirus. In fact, the interval was even expanded to 42 days for some people. In addition, to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC), a person isn’t considered “fully vaccinated” until 14 days after receiving the second jab of this “primary series”—that is, 35 to 42 days after jab number one.

The CDC thus classified these people as “unvaccinated” for anywhere from five to eight weeks after they got their first jab. The magnitude of the effect on data generated for public consumption remains immeasurably enormous.

Combined with the CDC's and mainstream media’s complete minimization and derogation of VAERS data showing not just the rate but the timing of the serious adverse jabs-related events reported to the system, this transparent deceit has left a public already reeling from covid lies even more woefully blinkered—in this case, concerning exactly what has happened to actual, not contrived, groups of people based on their “vaccination” status.

The CDC created this ad hoc definition of “fully vaccinated”—which the agency and the media quickly shorted to “vaccinated”—because it knew what was coming from the set-up and outcomes of the slapstick BioNTech trials: a wave of staggeringly inconvenient consequences to both the jabs’ reputation and the health of the jabs’ recipients within 30 days of injection number one.

Sure enough, the majority of official covid cases, hospitalizations, and deaths all occurred within 14 to 21 days of the first shot of the “primary series,” with the same association persisting for the subsequent, untested “boosters.” And the CDC has been allowed, by its own rules, to shovel all of this inconvenient data—including a pile of shots-caused injuries and deaths—into the category of “unvaccinated,” while using all of 2021 to sling around the patently deceptive yet alarmingly effective term “breakthrough infection.”

So, someone who presented the emergency department with a myocardial infarction four days after the first jab, with a positive in-hospital covid test (per the sham PCR method), would be considered an unvaccinated covid case. And if they died, they'd be considered a “covid death,” too—part of the 95 percent of people who, per the CDC, “died of covid” but were actually wrecked by something else.

This example demonstrates how loads of mundane positive covid tests were applied to the waves of people coming to hospitals with various non-covid problems—from jabs-injuries to broken bones—shortly after being jabbed.

The diabolical nature of the whole scheme is thus (at least) twofold: inflate covid case numbers and bury vaccine damage. Consider the implications when someone claims, for example, that data show that large numbers of people who were unvaccinated got myocarditis from covid alone. (I'm not talking about known instances of pre-jabs-rollout, post-covid myocarditis. This was rare in the otherwise healthy but not unheard of, and a range of viruses are known target the myocardium.)

As one increasingly banal consequence, all those graphs people are eager to show you “proving” the jabs were effective, nonlethal, or both rely on data and studies that employ these frivolous definitions of “vaccinated” and “unvaccinated.” As a rule, these people don't even know they're using junk data, wherever they've collected it. Mostly, they're victims of the CDC’s own data-disinformation campaign. But because of the spurious definition of “unvaccinated” the CDC pre-locked into place, much of this junk data forms the basis of earnestly derived but grossly misleading conclusions peppering the (already Fauci-, Gates-, and pharma-compromised) peer-reviewed literature as well. You can also find CDC propaganda on sites like that of the Kaiser Family Foundation.

“Changes in immunity among the unvaccinated” means “the un-jabbed could still fend off disease because their immune systems hadn’t been trashed.”

A “pandemic of the unvaccinated” was in fact a pandemic of the newly penetrated. And it's not difficult to prove; it's just been hard to start the spread and infect as many people as possible with this information. That’s too, bad, since, in the words of The Ethical Skeptic, “A full-blown echo pandemic underway - and no one cares.”

We have a few short weeks to start the spread of this grim but vital knowledge, and then the new shots will be here.

And remember to spread the word about the utility of masking, too! Let folks who prefer winding up with cancer to choose the N-95 kind, while those who would rather merely get sick from bacterial illnesses to stick with cloth (note the date on that one).