An example of psychotic vaccination policies and Wokism combining to cause serious harm

We* all need to turn off our televisions, because when we* do, magical things happen, like whole "pandemics" instantly disappearing

My position on the coronavirus vaccines and associated government-sponsored therapies involving jabs and novel potions is clear from past postings, and I got to it the same way anyone else could have, and still can: By looking around at the world and seeing what was happening, by talking to friends and family members all over the country and gathering their experiences, and by integrating this information in a way that formed the best, most logical available picture.

I got the “one-and-done” (hee hee hee; my online patient portal now says “1 of 3”) Johnson & Johnson vaccine in June 2021. I haven’t gotten any of the boosters. I don’t know a single unvaccinated person at a conversational level, and most people I know have gotten at least one booster.

No one has received any of these shots owing to reasoned guidance, and no convincing studies concerning their efficacy were made available at the start of the campaign or have been released since. This is because none exist. And bear in mind that Anthony Fauci and the CDC had already been caught lying and backtracking multiple times before the release of the first vaccine, ever assuring a slack-jawed CNN-watching public that these were not lies or revisions of recent history or even simple mistakes on the part of scientists; they were just revisions based on brand-new information about the virus.

Fauci—the worst of the many odious characters who have achieved mega-prominence, massive wealth gains, and widespread trust throughout this galactic barrage of buncombe—deserves to come to an extremely uncool, Joseph Smith-style end, not just for his lies but considering his involvement in gain-of-function microbial research all over the planet. Bill Gates’ bloated corpse should be tossed into the pisswater-filled ditch beside him.

I haven’t gotten covid, and in fact haven’t had so much as a cold since sometime in 2019. But at least two-thirds of the people I know—again, all vaccinated and many multiply boosted—have gotten it, and a few have had it more than once. People forced into contact with large numbers of people in closed spaces (one friend drives seniors around in a van) or who live in large metro areas have almost all gotten it. Fortunately, none had to be hospitalized, but it was pretty bad in one instance. My closest two friends in the area, one of them 97, have not gotten it. If I so much as suspected I had it, I would unwillingly avoid those two people until I knew for certain—no different than if I had any communicable and potentially serious disease.

Meanwhile, the public has been treated to the spectacle of former comedian turned narrative-serving lefto-zealot Stephen Colbert constantly mocking the unvaccinated and then getting covid, then getting “rebound” covid—all the while refusing to relent and instead saying he was glad he’d followed the “right” recommendations. And if that wasn’t enough, the still-beaming Fauci, jabbed four times, cordially announced that he too had contracted covid, but added that he would be taking Paxlovid, which quickly led to a more serious case.

Fauci used every step of this carnival of grandfatherly bafflegab—which should have been instantly derided by tens of millions of hoarsely braying people as the fiasco at was—as an opportunity to push both vaccines and Paxlovid, all with the help of the entire corporate media. And now President Biden has had it, or has it, establishing that the dead can also contract the illness and push the value of the vaccines that Biden himself categorically said would keep people from getting covid—the absolute definition, we know now and suspected even then, of “covid misinformation.”

No sane person could believe at this point that these vaccines do anything their proponents claim. I think that people across the political spectrum are beginning to understand the scope of this public deception, which seems too grandiose even in the eyes of those already long skeptical of government messaging, and are too aghast to do much about it besides simmer. I mean, what can any everyday citizens do other than invite the few remaining pro-Pfizer Twitter zealots to take their permanent misery and nonsense and shove their exaggerated or fabricated concerns up their masks?

Meanwhile, the government has maintained a facade of grave concern for historically oppressed people, along with some newly invented types of people who consider themselves historically oppressed, so that it doesn’t have to make any genuine overtures toward helping people in need. And corporations, ever obsessed with their ESG scores, have followed suit. Obviously, none of these people really gives a rip, because if anyone in charge did, Uncle Sam wouldn’t have stopped the $300-a-month payments to people with kids and chosen instead to funnel incalculable sums of money into Ukraine, which everyone seems to forget was a corrupt bunghole of its own well before Russia—a more obvious, larger, and smellier bunghole—invaded it this winter.

And at the other end of the Wokish sewer main disguised as a progressive pipeline, we* have a whole new class of social-media grifters receiving and gobbling down the fruits of these companies’ hilariously insincere “social justice” efforts, making no effort to conform to any of their fitness, activism, or personal-betterment promises and instead remaining their inherently sordid, drama-rousing, “influencer” selves. We even have a half-literate bozo with advanced degrees from Columbia being paraded about the running rags yelling about “ending racism” (which would look like…?) and casually using terms like “Whiteness” while somehow expecting the targets of these slurs to willingly climb aboard her grifting-train.

We also have the rise of the white quasi-professional female incel and her counterpart in the privileged class who has more than she needs and deserves but clamors for yet more—more clicks, more recognition at any cost—with these lovelies importing their lifelong resentments toward successful people and their skanky momentum from #MeToo straight into Wokism and aligning these bedevilments with those of PoC and transpeople in their unending collective war against aging white males—none of whom themselves could possibly have issues with the same white male billionaire bastards presently rearranging the world to their own kiddie-reaming liking and to colossal human detriment.

None of these people care about you. But I do, so today I bring you a heartwarming tale from the confluence of covid-scamming and the patent insincerity of government officials chanting “BLM” at every opportunity and putting those and other letters in their social profiles along with their preferred pronouns.

Consider the full picture here. This is a virus that is trivially dangerous to kids. Furthermore, the vaccine that D.C. kids may need to get before heading to school soon doesn’t do a damned thing anyway.

Kids have been flailing for the past few years thanks to the various covid-related interruptions to schooling and the normal flow of childhood life, and this has hit youngsters already struggling academically especially hard. A lot of kids having problems in school exist day and night at the anxious junction of poverty and domestic violence, of sudden loud crashes and repeated power or telephone shut-offs.

At school, poor kids have access to lunches—food—something people in cities like Boulder don’t think about in their constant craze to keep their kids free of poisons like animal flesh and gluten. Also, if I have my facts right, public school teachers are obligated to transmit reports of abuse they receive from their students to the authorities, at least in theory an important means of rooting out critical problems in children’s homes.

You don’t have to be a sociologist to see how hard unvaccinated kids in D.C.—most of them black and virtually all of them poor—would be hit by a policy that keeps them at home, or somewhere unsupervised, all day. Such a policy would have to include extraordinarily strong scientific backing to justify the costs of its implementation. This policy? It has none. It is a prescription for crime spikes, academic growth stunting, and vast interpersonal misery. None of which the screwdriver-sipping, chortling Karens and Chads who read The New York Times on spacious patios in southeastern Connecticut will ever see or think about.

Liberals should be furious at this, and whatever honest ones remain probably are. The Washington Post shouldn’t just be doing thumb-twiddling reporting on this travesty-in-the-making; it should be calling for the firing of the administrators in charge of the proposed policy. It should be viciously demeaning the entire idea, lest schools elsewhere decide to fall into line and ruin their schools and communities for no good reason, too.

But the corporate media is fully a propaganda system now, not a locus of information-gathering and news dissemination. So instead of learning about stuff like this from whatever real news outlets you favor, you only get to read harried and pissed-off essays from people who are supposedly far-right or drifting that way—the kind of sad old dogs whose barking is clearly tied to their diminishing white relevance, and whose shouting about society-destabilizing patterns has to be rooted in some kind of “-ism” or anti-humanistic impulse.