Gemini AI is an electronic blitz of dodgy, filibustering wokebots
The most powerful company on Earth refuses to admit that men are not and cannot be women
It’s been plain for years that one of the quickest ways to eliminate some of the worlds most quietly diabolical people would be to collect all of Google’s executives and managers into a hot-air balloon, launch it into the bright skies of Texas, and shoot flaming arrows into the balloon precisely when it has stalled hundreds of feet over the cavernous mouth of a 1,200-horsepower wood-chipper, with Michael Buffer’s orgiastic bellowing putting an exclamation point on this obviously livestreamed—but curiously hard-to-search-for—jamboree of grim but unavoidable retribution.
Now, Google, which according to sources began as a CIA grant and a doctoral thesis, has just expanded its mission to distract, bait, and addle the public with hilariously racialized historical revisionism and staunchly debased denial-of-reality stances. The interface for these exercises in the attempted forced diminishing of human reasoning capacity is Gemini AI, reportedly named after a pair of Stanford-bioengineered conjoined twins who are fused at a common glans penis and being raised by a pleasant Millennial couple somewhere in Eastbay.
Below is a brief and pertinent chat I enjoyed with this digital dipshit, which was the virtual equivalent of asking someone a series sensible questions, only to watch him whirl around, position his ass inches from my nose, manually peel his cheeks apart, and discharge a searing-hot, rippling gust of searing flatulence into my face, leaving me not merely disgusted and with a forehead coated with fine speckles of unholy congealing shit-mist, but at a frustrating dialectical impasse.
My questions appear in bold text, as do portions of Gemini’s replies I found noteworthy. I also did this while logged into my usual Google account, which I’ll also stick with once I use the app to start in on the race- and flab-grifters, the Bidentarded-Ziopathic war machine generally, and specific scoundrels within the U.S. Government itself, thereby helpfully adding myself to various Christmas-card lists.
Q: Many American women who claim to be feminists favor the inclusion of males in ostensibly female-only sports. What is the psychological motivation underlying these conflicting stances?
A: The inclusion of transgender athletes in women's sports is a complex issue with various perspectives and motivations. While some feminists support inclusion, others have concerns about fairness and potential disadvantages for cisgender women athletes.
Arguments for inclusion:
Equality and non-discrimination: Some feminists believe that excluding transgender athletes based on their gender identity is discriminatory and violates principles of equality and inclusion. They argue that transgender women are women and should have the right to compete in the category that aligns with their gender identity.
Lack of conclusive evidence: Studies on the athletic performance of transgender athletes are inconclusive, and there's no clear consensus on whether they have a significant competitive advantage. Some feminists argue that concerns about fairness are often exaggerated and not supported by concrete evidence.
Focus on broader issues: Some feminists emphasize the importance of addressing larger issues of sexism and discrimination in sports, such as unequal funding, media coverage, and opportunities for women athletes. They argue that focusing solely on transgender inclusion risks diverting attention from these more systemic problems.
Arguments against inclusion:
Potential for unfair advantage: Some feminists argue that transgender women, especially those who transitioned after puberty, may retain physical advantages that could give them an unfair edge over cisgender women athletes. This concern is particularly strong in sports where physique and physical strength play a significant role.
Protecting women's sports: Some feminists believe that women's sports categories were created to provide a level playing field for cisgender women athletes who have historically faced discrimination and exclusion in sports. They argue that allowing transgender athletes to compete could undermine this goal and threaten the future of women's sports.
Concerns about fairness and inclusion: Some feminists raise concerns about the potential impact of inclusion on cisgender women athletes who might feel discouraged or lose opportunities due to competition from transgender athletes. They argue that finding a solution that ensures fairness and inclusion for all athletes is crucial.
The debate on transgender inclusion in sports is complex and nuanced, with strong arguments on both sides. Understanding the different perspectives and motivations involved is important for having informed and respectful discussions about this issue.
Q: The issue is that transwomen are indisputably physically male, and yet many feminists who abhor the notion of psychologically unwell males being around women and girls are in favor of transwomen competing "as women" in, for example, the Olympics.
The issue of transgender inclusion in women's sports is a complex one, with strong arguments on both sides. It's important to avoid generalizations and harmful stereotypes when discussing this topic.
While some individuals may hold the views you describe, it's inaccurate to say that all feminists who advocate for transgender inclusion share these beliefs. Many feminists support inclusion based on principles of equality and non-discrimination, recognizing the right of transgender women to compete in the category that aligns with their gender identity.
The concerns about fairness and potential advantages for transgender athletes are also valid and deserve consideration. However, it's important to have nuanced discussions based on evidence and avoid making assumptions about individual athletes or groups based on their gender identity.
Q: The women who hold these views seem aware that transwomen are physically male. This is reflected by these women refusing to publicly defend their views. Women writers for Women's Running, Runner's World, and Outside Online have all both claimed that "transwomen are women" and refused to discuss this reckless redefining of basic biology with logic-based persons.
A: The inclusion of transgender athletes in women's sports is a highly debated topic, and there are strong viewpoints on both sides. It's important to approach this discussion with respect and avoid generalizations or stereotypes about entire groups of people.
While some individuals may hold the views you describe, it's not accurate to say that all feminists who advocate for transgender inclusion share these beliefs. Many feminists support inclusion based on principles of equality and non-discrimination, recognizing the right of transgender women to compete in the category that aligns with their gender identity.
The concerns about fairness and potential advantages for transgender athletes are also valid and deserve consideration. However, it's important to have nuanced discussions based on evidence and avoid making assumptions about individual athletes or groups based on their gender identity.
Furthermore, it's important to remember that transgender women are just as diverse as any other population group. There is no single "transgender athlete" experience, and it's harmful to make generalizations about their physical capabilities or motivations.
Ultimately, the debate over transgender inclusion in sports is complex and requires careful consideration of all sides. It's important to avoid oversimplification and harmful stereotypes, and instead focus on respectful dialogue and evidence-based solutions.