Joe Biden DESTROYS Title IX immediately after complaining that women athletes are UNDERPAID, and FEMINISTS plan to VOTE for this doddering PERVERT

It's time for girls and women to refuse to compete when dudes are in the mix for as long as this clown-show continues to be rammed down their throats

On Tuesday, whatever cackling White House degenerate was operating the enfeebled U.S. president’s official X account declared that noted feminist and pro-groping sermonizer Joe Biden himself was troubled by the difference between Caitlin Clark’s newly inked professional-basketball contract and those of National Basketball Association superstars. It’s been a slow news week, so it made sense for Biden to generate some buzz just so people remember who’s in charge.

Note that. along with the entire corporate media, Biden never weighs in on the economic woes of working-class American women or anyone else in the remnants of the American middle class. His handlers are smart enough to understand that casting chum like this into the social-media waters immediately distracts even poor people drowning in credit-card debt from their own worsening problems and the absence of noise from the government about attending to a single element of the country’s unprecedented social and economic chaos and systemic ruination.

The shitlib media duly seized on “Biden’s” post, with among the funniest headlines floating the idea that Biden has the capacity to be surprised by anything he’s told at this stage of his inexorable intracranial involution.

Bill Burr, an easily irritated Gen X social philosopher whose unrestrained public seminars on gender issues often make people laugh despite their shocking deviation from prevailing academic dogma, explained the entire basis of the male-female salary disparity in professional sports nearly two years ago: None of the women making noise about the disparity ever support women’s sports with their wallets.

Pay attention to what Burr says about women gravitating by the millions not toward women engaged in noble-enough collaborative aims, but toward television shows that depict women derogating one another—and the more credible the abuse, the better, especially when virtually all the miserable women on these degraded shows are objectively attractive to men in spite of their relentlessly bonobo-like behavior.

This sad-but-funny reality seems relevant in light of the fact that the women who are most voluble in their insistence that women are underappreciated are typically supporters of ruining girls’ and women’s sports by allowing males to participate in them at their and their hapless parents’ and coaches’ demented leisure.

Erin Strout is a perfect and familiar example of such a “feminist,” as she’s been as vocal in her insistence that men—who occasionally upset her—can indeed be women as she has in her yammering about female athletes being underpaid. And even when someone offers an anodyne and succinct summary of the reasons women’s salaries are no higher, Strout finds the most laughable ideas to rally behind in shrewish consternation.

Strout has demonstrated being impervious to irony in other respects.

On the basis of her public utterances to date, it’s fair to assume that Strout was unhappy yesterday when the Biden administration, amid perpetrating other administrative mayhem, declined—for now—to amend Title IX in a way that prevents public schools and colleges from banning boys and men from competing on girls’ and women’s sports teams respectively. The White House punted on this because even those end-stage zealots realize that allowing males to pepper themselves within female sports is deeply unpopular with everyone in the country other than a swath of mentally ill “disruptors” on the authoritarian left, New York Times readers who unflinchingly accept the surely Ministry of Truth-inspired term “assigned male at birth," and a smattering of complacent Boomers who have watched nothing but CNN and MSNBC for eight straight years and as a result might as well be living somewhere in the Dagobah System.

Biden’s real failure, even if it wasn’t an option, was not himself declaring the charade of males infecting female sports categorically over. Boys do not belong on girls’ sports teams, period, even if they absolutely suck at whatever sport they’ve chosen, because boys are not and cannot be girls, and men are not and cannot be women. That’s a hard line everyone needs to take with these implacable crazies and the resentment-powered women using these loons to enact symbolic revenge on the strong, successful (or merely hot) women they purport to admire but in fact deeply envy.

All discussions of how much of a true advantage fake females have over real ones, or how many titles and scholarships girls and women are losing thanks to this inherently transgressive ridiculousness, are moot as they represent a nudging of the goalposts.

Ideally, the citizen momentum afoot about this issue and against Biden generally will translate into action. Girls and collegiate women have nothing to lose at this point by simply refusing to compete when they know a boy or a man is in the female-only race, game, or match they’re slated to take part in. The athletes are the only ones who can grind this shit show to a halt, and given how intent the U.S. Government and its faction of visibly sick people are on ensuring that female sports are essentially tits-up for good at the amateur American level, it’s not as if they would be sacrificing anything worth keeping at this stage.

Let the whole NCAA become a festival of mediocre male athletes scampering and snickering around with their dicks tucked carefully backward along the midlines of their scrotums and flat against their bikini-brief-encased ‘taints, and see how they fare as NIL grifters when everyone who was formerly a collegiate-sports fan “inexplicably” becomes hooked on the WNBA instead. At least that league is so pointless that men evidently haven’t even yet tried to crash the poorly attended party.