Outside Online is pushing outright lies about covid shots and myocarditis

If you're going to run interference for a destructive campaign by the government against its citizens, at least don't be lazy about it

Outside Online published a piece earlier this month intended to convince readers that mRNA coronavirus injections have not been causally linked to a significant number of cases of myocarditis, particularly in younger men. This is a lie, and because this piece is dishonestly framed as being about something other than those injections, it’s buried in the final paragraph.

Peter Vigneron wrote this as if addressing the question, “Why have athletes regularly experienced heart problems over the years?” This is an obvious distraction. What people want to know at this point in history is “Are these incidents really happening more than before, and could the cause really be the unspeakable?”

The header of the article’s final, self-immolating paragraph is meant as another half-hearted distraction. Vigneron (or whoever edited this) knows that people don’t consider the coronavirus itself to be the “wild card” these days in terms of longer-term health problems.

There are more problems than words in this paragraph. There is no indication of where “probably around 0.6 percent” comes from, although that doesn’t really matter since “probably” renders the claim moot.

[1/28/23 7:48 p.m. MST note: 0.6 percent is about 1 in 160. As I type this, 102 million Americans have officially been diagnosed with covid. Dividing this number by 160 gives 637,500 Americans who, by this standard, have experienced clinical-level myocarditis as a result of covid-19 infection alone. Spread out over the 35 months that have elapsed since the beginning of March 2020, this translates to around 620 new cases of myocarditis per day—solely from the virus, remember—in just the United States. This is so preposterous a premise that I didn’t notice it until after sending this out.]

There is no mention of age-stratified risks—not of contracting covid, and not of suffering myocarditis from the shots.

And consider what it means to admit that the shots can cause myocarditis, and state that this condition can lead to cardiac arrest, but then somehow deny that the shots can lead to cardiac arrest. A can cause B, and B can cause C, but A can never result in C? Never ever?

There is no source for any of the claims made by Dr. Tamanna Singh, director of the Cleveland Clinic’s Sports Cardiology Center, who confidently says “the benefit of vaccination far outweighs the risk.” The risk of what? And is that as true for 80-year-old women as it is for 20-year-old men?

Singh is either lying or a really dumb doctor. Enough research had accumulated even by the spring and early summer of 2021 to both rule out coronavirus infection itself as a significant contributor to future myocarditis and implicate the mRNA shots in an increase in myocarditis in a particular age group.

Last August, Vinay Prasad noted a study that broadened the definition of “young” to “under 40” and showed that the risk of myocarditis after a second dose of Moderna’s nucleic-acid soup was extremely elevated compared to young men in other ‘rona-related categories.

And in December, Prasad and a colleague, concerned at the government’s insistence on injecting everyone—regardless of not only the age-dependent risk of getting sick from covid, but also the age-dependent risk of being repeatedly injected—reviewed the existing shots-myocarditis literature and found that most of the research seemed to intentionally fail to age-stratify its data.

Considering that a lot of active men under the age of forty read Outside Online (to the extent anyone really does anymore), this is actually a catastrophically bad piece of journalism. If 15 younger men out of 100,000 wind up with shots-induced myocarditis, that’s about one in every 6,700. And it takes far, far more injections than 6,700 in this age group (and all others) to prevent a single covid-related hospitalization, and far more than that to prevent even one “serious” hospitalization.

The overall risk of a serious adverse event after an mRNA injection series is about 1 in 800 and not shrinking. What usually happens when vaccines are this dangerous is that they are withdrawn—in fact, the historical threshold for discontinuing a vaccination campaign is orders of magnitude lower than whatever would compel the monsters running the Western world to admit to having made a serious, um, mistake.

The point isn’t that the shots are killing huge numbers of people via heart attacks. It’s that everyone is lying about the fact that there is, in fact, a far higher risk of this and other problems from the shots than mainstream sources will admit to at this point—the ones who hire writers and editors who even bother to fact-check anything, that is. Which is none of them. Just none of them.

Keep in mind that even The Washington Post recently admitted that 90 percent of official “covid deaths” have actually resulted from something else. And the WaPo didn’t acknowledge its own past lying on the matter.

Of course, “90 percent” is only about halfway or so to the truth.

Everyone is lying about various consequential elements of reality, and I’m tired of it. That’s my clever, slam-bang wrap-up. Oh, and never do your own research—that’s for people with inherently high skepticism and curiosity and a penchant for discrediting lies even if no one cares.