"Post-covid" jabs are already here, and they ensure another massive Pharma coup coupled to another equally massive public-health misadventure
The corporate capture of the American media and medical system has grave consequences beyond dangerous "vaccines." If Americans don't start resisting, millions of lives will be ruined or lost
(Note to e-mail recipients: Substack has indicated that this post is too long for some e-mail clients, so if the text below looks incomplete, click on the post title above—which is extremely long and easy to see—to read the full version on the Web.)
A little over three weeks ago, I made a note of the editorial pivot by The New York Times in recent years from “It’s the food, stupid; kids need to eat better and get moving” to “Shoot the bastards full of poison, then cut their digestive systems out” as the best way to slow or reverse the fattening of America’s children.
There are a few things everyone should be aware about the American healthcare system.
One is that medical education is largely funded by the pharmaceutical industry. New Zealand is the only country besides the U.S. that currently allows direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications. Three-fourths of primetime television advertising dollars are spent by Pharma, but they put loads of money into other forms of influence-peddling, too. And this isn’t new.
As recently as 2009, ethicists at revered institutions such as Harvard University were still allowed to express alarm and disgust, however tepidly, at what Pharma was doing—and had already done—to the American medical-education system.
Another “secret” is that physicians and other providers with prescribing power are like other people who earn money for their labors: They respond to financial incentives.
The most important aspect of the American healthcare system— its defining trait, in fact, owing to the glut of private equity flowing within and through it—is that it is organized around medicating, operating on, and maintaining sickness, not curing it. This has been true for a long time, but in an age of unvarnished biomedical fascism, the protracted-death machine—HMOs, health-insurance companies, for-profit hospitals, and of course drugs aimed at every condition real and imagined—is gaining even more momentum. The formula is simple: Add extreme interventions without adding health, so that Pharma profits never wane. And if you can use a knife on it, slice it out.
If you don’t believe this, you’ll have to explain why cancer, obesity, heart disease, mood disorders, dyslipidemia, and diabetes and other metabolic disturbances are all on the rise in the United States despite all these conditions (some of them related) having been treated chiefly with drugs, often galactically expensive ones, for decades on an enormous and ever-expanding scale. Meanwhile, Pharma profits keep soaring. It kind of seems like the system wants more people sick than healthy, doesn’t it?
Enter the first update in fourteen years by the American Academy of Pediatrics to its guidelines for treating childhood obesity, which hit the Web early last month.
You should be aghast at this point that the chief medical body in charge of the well-being of American children is suggesting these interventions in children. They’re not good for anyone. Whoever is ultimately responsible for this should be strapped to chairs and force-fed corn starch until they are puking and belching great white powdery plumes out of every orifice, then given the mRNA jabs they’ve all said they’ve gotten but never actually have.
Forbes, another obvious tool of the Gates Foundation (oh hi Bill) and other malevolent forces, wasted no time in listing what’s available for parents to stick into the arms and pop into the mouths of their overweight kids.
Liraglutide also goes by Ozempic, a once-a-week shot as opposed to Saxenda’s daily administration. After a four-week introductory period, Ozempic is given by injection in suggested amounts ranging from 2 to 8 milligrams every four weeks. With this stuff costing close to $1,000 per 2-milligram unit dissolved in 1.5 milliliters of solution, this means recipients of this potion—or, somewhat more likely, their parents—will be paying anywhere from around $13,000 to $52,000 a year. (Meanwhile, the absolutely useless injectable form of naltrexone, Vivitrol, is currently going for about $1,684 per month or over $20,000 per year.)
Ozempic is not currently covered by insurance, which The Washington Post made sure to bark about in the hope of compelling lobbyists to redouble their efforts in this area. Both the WaPo and The New York Times, both of which may as well have Pfizer marketing departments inside their own corporate headquarters, went all-out in pushing the “dope and cut your fat kids down to size” idea.
Would this be happening without Pfizer’s influence on the media and the government, which steers the media independent of Pharma’s aims, some of these congruent with Uncle Sam’s? Obviously not. You’d be insane to think anyone, even the daft pseudo-journalists at the NYT, believes that the untainted medical consensus has swung from “Watch the food” to “It’s genetic, your only hope is a pill or an operating suite.”
As a reminder of what a livid joke The New York Times is—and I’m surely addressing at least a few people who are and will forever remain paying NYT subscribers regardless of how many times I highlight brazenly piss-poor ethics a child could detect—a recent headline evolved over a matter of hours, with the message changing from “You have no free will when it comes to weight loss” to “You should summon the will to take drugs, otherwise your fat ass is toast,” with the title-text fed to Google for indexing even more explicit:
That essay came shortly after a one-two propaganda punch in which the NYT, as others have done, “explained” that the science underlying the cause(s) of obesity has been revamped. Again, it’s not the food, or what you do with yourself when not eating. It’s genetic fate. And deadly DNA requires proportionally risky—and, as fate would dictate, extremely pricey—interventions.
Gina Kolata is a longtime NYT “Me Do Science” cartoon character, with her other contributions including the idea that testosterone might be irrelevant when it comes to sex differences in athletic ability. She writes whatever fictions she’s told to write, and she’s become so lazy (and probably jaded) that in the above piece she casually contradicts herself, emphasizing that genes are the overwhelming driver of obesity but then claiming that binge eating and decreased physical activity worsen obesity.
Nothing about the science of obesity has changed. What’s changed is that the media have given up reporting on how metabolically battered most Americans are by the time they’ve reached puberty, because there is far too much sucrose and its derivatives in the typical American child’s diet for most of them to process without gaining weight and accelerating their journey toward diabetes and other health woes.
Most docs know this. They just don’t talk about it.
And the Centers for Disease Control recently agreed that diet and activity make a tremendous difference, although U.S. health officials emphasizing none of this—not even one lonesome time during a long and lonely period—during and after the unfurling of covid.
The Biden administration, already the most corrupt in American history, recently doled out another lying assignment to a “Brainwashed Democrats will believe anyone who is black” type whose only job in this case is to push the “Obesity is genetic, your kids should get drugs or surgery” message on behalf of the booming and spiraling biomedical-security establishment. (Also, don’t forget that diet culture is racist.)
And look where Dr. Cody was trained: Harvard! Perhaps she should refer to her own institution’s information about processed foods and the root causes of obesity.
And how are Americans doing with the new drugs so far? Well, they do what they’re advertised to do.
If you do the math on this, you find that Ozempic and Saxenda alone have the potential to earn Novo Nordisk over a trillion dollars in the next decade. And I didn’t even look at the prices of the other drugs, which I know are high, or the specific side effects of all of them, which are plentiful and being rigorously denied as I type this by the ignominious functionaries of various relentlessly degraded American institutions and systems.
The people maintaining the medical system, who are either not healthcare providers or morally bankrupt former providers like Scott Gottlieb, don’t care if you die, especially if you can be milked for decades of profit before you expire of either one of the chronic diseases you had that were treated with multiple medications or from the effects of all those medications. And the public is being asked, in fact almost required—through relentless booster campaigns and jabbering about “the next pandemic”—to continue to accept that what it’s being told is not only cutting-edge science, but science coming from ethically centered, even noble people.
None of this is true. Fauci, Inc. might as well hate us all, so single-mindedly so they chase riches and glory, both unearned in the extreme. Same with the scathingly lurid freaks dozing and masturbating about the White House at all hours between acts of grand civic larceny. The glut of “sex-change” surgeries sterilizing youngsters, many being done without their parents’ consent; untested, and, as it happens, both ineffective and dangerous mRNA “vaccines”; these new absurd weight-loss guidelines; and the media eagerly underwriting all of it—it all means the same thing. You are nothing more than an inconvenience who may live too long and without enough immersion in prescriptions and surgeries to solve problems moving around more and avoiding too many insulinogenic foods for your own constitution’s liking.
Megan Roche of “Some Work, No Play” is evidence that even physicians awarded degrees from the most prestigious medical schools—she’s a Stanford Med alumna—can exhibit galactic and unapologetic levels of either confusion or sabotage precisely around human medicine because they want to make money. Roche stands by as her “co-coach” husband babbles about trans women being the same as women and enrolling obese slugs in “exercise” protocols. Conform, spend grant money, poach other people’s clients, repeat.
I would highly recommend doing whatever you need to do to extricate yourself from any kind of dependence on the U.S. healthcare system. Obviously, we all wind up in its clutches periodically or at least eventually, as no one can avoid getting seriously ill or injured forever. But when 40 percent of American men over forty are on statins for absolutely no defensible reason, and around 20 percent are on some kind of mental-health drug, and no one is getting better from these and countless other “expert” guidelines, I would be highly suspicious of any new medications targeting metabolism. Or immunity. Or anything.
It’s both dismal and liberating, but Americans are at a point at which the wisest option by far when it comes to personal health is to manage it on your own as best you can. There have been respiratory viruses in the air and edible things growing out of the ground for many thousands of years. It might be time for me to learn more about a personalized food supply myself, since I’m so fond of eating the stuff.
(P.S. None of the foregoing means that your own doctor is a hapless tool of the establishment. It just means he or she is fighting an incredible tide and possible censures for trying to avoid the wave.)