With the new jab rollout, Boulder County Health deletes it page containing lies about covid vaccine safety and testing and links to the same lies on the CDC website instead
These people need to be booted the fuck out
On August 1, I laid the foundation for a letter I sent six days later through Boulder County, Colorado’s contact portal expressing concern over the lies posted about covid-19 vaccines on the county website. I was promised a response within 48 hours by the messaging system, and over a month later, I’ve heard nothing. (As I occasionally mention, I live in Boulder and am known to recommend that more trail runners move here.)
Yesterday, the county deleted the page containing the lies I referenced in my complaint. The link to that page from the county’s main page about covid-19 vaccines now leads instead to a page on the Centers for Disease Control website.
I won’t spend much time on hammering away at how ill-advised anyone has to be at this point to accept any more of these jabs into their bodies, because by now people either accept reality or they don’t, and despite my dogged attempts to charm readers with my accommodating style, I’m pretty sure the reality-deniers have moved on. But a couple of recent analyses are worth mentioning.
In one of them, Steve Kirsch analyzed Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data from over 15,000 U.S. nursing homes and found that people in these facilities stood a drastically higher chance of dying “of covid” both after the initial jabs rollout for the elderly in late 2020 and when the first “booster” was introduced in the summer of 2021. Kirsch offered a deeper analysis of the data in a follow-up post, in which he observed that
The US Nursing Home data is ground truth for the COVID vaccine. If it doesn’t work for the very population it was supposed to benefit the most, it’s all over.
This is gold-standard data on over two million people from am interactive database that any real reporter or doctor can access, and odds ratios have long been a standard tool in evaluating medical interventions.
There is simply nothing to deny here. You either accept what it means or you don’t.
It’s been bleakly entertaining to watch a parade pf pseudo-intellectual smears against Kirsch, not only from people who don’t understand statistics of any kind—most of the leaky assholes on the Boulder County Board of Health fit into this category—but also from people who do yet have instead tried to batter Kirsch’s purely numerical conclusions into irrelevance with moral arguments when they “engage” him at all. These “resisters” sound exactly like creationists who deny the validity of radio-isotope dating because they need to believe the Earth is around 10,000 years old, and the maddening thing about this is that many if not most of the Kirsch critics I’ve seen are rational people in general and recognize clearly that creationists and their argumentation styles are a sad joke.
And at the other end of the age spectrum, a study has emerged establishing what people’s eyes and ears have been telling them, at least about adults—that the shots are associated with a decreased immune response to bacteria, fungi, and other pathogens, many of which are far more dangerous to children than any C-19 variant. The authors, wanting to get their paper published, used the term “alters cytokine responses to heterologous pathogens” instead of “trashes kids’ natural immunity.”
Since these mRNA shots are literally experimental products, and the straightforward theoretical mechanisms by which they can compromise immunity have been validated all over the place, this should surprise no one. Nevertheless, if it wasn’t on CNN or in Vinay Prasad’s “brave” newsletter, it can’t possibly be true.
Prasad is vehemently recommending against the latest jab, claiming it wasn’t tested on humans. He actually would be better off shutting his mouth about this because he has continued to selectively recommend, and improperly condemn, the extant jabs even though he knows—I think—that not only were those products also improperly tested, but what little human testing was done indicated an impending catastrophe, one now still gaily underway.
Prasad is like someone who impresses the locals by warming about the dangers of teenage vaping while he and everyone ignores the kids dropping dead of fentanyl overdoses all over town.
Here is some scant but hard information on the new shots, from a “clinical trial” lasting all of fifteen days.
So four of the 50 people who got the new Moderna shot had to receive medical attention, but whoever was in charge of jiggering these numbers managed to blame only one of these episodes specifically on the shot. Even the CDC has admitted that there is no known clinical benefit to getting this crap, and no sane person expects one.
As for Pfizer, they tested the shot on ten mice. No human trials whatsoever, and the mice data, not that it matters, it considered “preclinical” at this stage.
Of note, the Moderna shot wasn’t tested on anyone under 12, and the Pfizer shot was given only to Stuart Little’s family. Yet the CDC is recommending either company’s jab for kids as young as six months of age, and wants everyone six and older to get one.
Meanwhile, U.S. Food and Drug Administration officials, who are just as corrupt as everyone at the CDC, recently admitted in a taped phone call that they simply ignore data they don’t like about the jabs as it arises and don’t even do statistical analyses of whatever adverse events they don’t manage to ignore outright—a genuinely demonic practice, but one that in general isn’t new when it comes to getting drugs approved. This is all in an episode of Dr. Drew posted on September 6, although those with Twitter accounts can view a segment of the show by clicking on the image below.
People’s stubborn inability to accept that these jabs have not merely proven insufficient to stop the spread of a head cold but were an outright dangerous scam from the start is a major problem. But it’s being compounded by a worse one, which is that even sensible people have allowed their entire concept of what public health should consist of to be radically shifted in the direction of “non-skeptical.” That is, even people who three years ago would have been alarmed that a shot tested only on mice was approved for public use are now sort of ho-hum about the way things work, even those who see the whole covid-19 show mostly for what it is.
It is vitally important that we* anchor ourselves in the same reality we have always inhabited even as others are being swept from it by implacable media propaganda and relentless disinformation on “fact-checking sites” and elsewhere, and use the same standards of evidence to defend that reality that we have used since we learned to think for ourselves. This new way of causally poisoning huge numbers of people just doesn’t work for me.
And in a hilarious side note, the FDA is going after pseudoephedrine (most commonly marketed as Sudafed in the U.S.) and diphenhydramine (the active ingredient in Benadryl) for being “ineffective” as nasal decongestants. While diphenhydramine makes me jittery, millions of people use it as an effective sleep aid.
Take note: The FDA only cares about ineffective drugs when their patents have expired and everyone can get them cheaply. Pretty soon, poor people will have to use a new, expensive, equally ineffective pharmaceutical product when they get the sniffles. It will likely be an mRNA-based nasal spray. If they can get it into Dayquil, too, the government won’t have to be so adamant about pushing jabs to accomplish the task of physically degrading and killing as many people as possible. This goes over better with the public than simply slashing Medicare, Social Security, and Medicaid.
With the deletion of the page I references in my ignored letter, Boulder County’s entire covid-19 subsite now consist in effect of some tubby, feckless, blue-haired Lime scooter-rider in a pride mask jacking his warty thumb over his shoulder toward Atlanta and grunting “Just following the CDC science!” The local authorities have thus shirked all responsibility for the health of its citizens and are admitting to being unvarnished tools of the pharma-government profit-by-death complex who not don’t care about public or personal health, ignore real science, and don’t reply to concerned residents. They are “just doing their jobs,” which makes them worse than worthless. They’re a genuine menace.
The people propagating these lies from Boulder County government platforms and elsewhere are paid to serve the public, not Pfizer, Moderna, or the funeral industry. They should be canned merely for blowing off any earnest letter they receive, since responding is to these is one of their responsibilities. But the greater problem is that they continue to lie and use these lies to push dangerous products on people, all while knowing better. And they need to be hectored continually until they either respond directly or quit their posts and waddle along toward other grifts for the enfeebled of character and mind.