A basic heuristic for determining whether a medical intervention is dangerous
It's very easy to show that anyone who received an mRNA shot was gaslit into making an incredibly reckless decision. This can't be undone, but it doesn't have to happen again
Below is an easy way for open-minded people still agnostic about the validity of controversial tools like basic math to determine that the mRNA “vaccines” were deeply dangerous. This might be especially helpful given that “the next pandemic” is already here and the same grinning, subhuman dungmonkeys are capering about even more malodorously they were three years ago—except the turd-flinging is even worse this time, because “vaccines” are already available and U.S. lockdowns already “worked” once.
You don’t even have to know how many millions of people the shots have undeniably killed or wounded so far, and continue to kill and maim long after their administration, to grasp how harmful the shots are. You can even pretend that you’ve done nothing but jerk off and play video games while avoiding all news, real and fake, for over two years—assuming this isn’t actually the case—and still figure out from this post that no one other than the people on my secret personal hit-list ever should have received these shots.
I have presented versions of this heuristic to people who seem somewhat interested in inhabiting a cheap but passable knock-off of reality, maybe even something better. The response has invariably been either silence or deflection, the latter often involving a refusal on the part of the unconvinced to look at the source material I provide and sly, perhaps unconscious versions of an ad hominem (“You’re too frazzled to get it”). This quickly becomes tiresome, especially when partial or pure retards are its self-indulgent sources.
Anyone can use the same evaluation process and arrive at the only rational conclusion there is. It goes like this:
ONE: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration sought to hide from the public the data from the “clinical trials” performed on the mRNA shots until everyone involved in their manufacture, marketing, distribution, and mandated use is dead.
The official period the FDA sought for complete released of the documents was 75 years. And this is coupled to immunity from lawsuits against the manufacturer owing to the sham Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) the U.S. Government, now headed largely by drug-makers, granted the drug-makers.
If you knew where to look, this information was available by November 2021. Not everyone knew where to look, but I’ve mentioned this on multiple occasions since.
In January 2022, a judge ordered a hundred-fold increase in the rate of the release of the "clinical trials” documents and data. The reason I’m putting “clinical trials” in quotation marks was available by March 2022 thanks to scientists who jumped on top of the data as soon as its forced release was underway, among them Josh Guetzgow of Jackanapes Junction.
But waiting for the granular details wasn’t needed to conclude that the data would be uglier than anything ever produced in its class, with the stench of lethality and debility destined to be a matter of gruesome degree.
If the shots were safe, as advertised, there was no other reason the FDA would have fought in court to conceal the information it was concealing.
I can’t emphasize this one point enough, because even the “You’re going too far” crowd has no response to this.
Because I am clearly and unapologetically disgusted and angry these days about far more than the mRNA injection campaigns, some commenters have proposed that I am catastrophizing the dangers of the mRNA shots as a result of emotional reasoning.
I don’t think this perception is widespread, but it struck me as a strange way for someone to respond to the numbers I was posting (do data get mad?). Yes, I was and am pissed, but data are data. Then I realized that these people were simply refusing to consider the evidence; either they did not trust the raw data (despite its source) or for some reason couldn’t understand what these data implied.
But more recently, I’ve recognized that these people are, understandably, engaged in the very emotionally rooted “reasoning” they have suggested plagues my own analyses. Because almost everyone I know got these injections and I did not, I often forget how fearful some of them are that the mRNA shots have adversely affected their health or harmed someone they know. Or will, if this hasn’t happened already. This is understandable.
I realize that almost everyone who got these shots either literally had to or was coerced into doing to by so many forces that they might as well have been mandated to get them. This is tragic and I don’t blame anyone for not knowing what was going on at the time. Most of my friends received multiple doses of jab-juice; some of them believed they had a real choice—don’t we always want to imagine we have agency, even when it’s been removed from the equation?—but none of them really did. Not in the freedom-lovin’ United States, anyway.
But you have this information now, and you would be a reckless fool or have a death wish if you willingly submit to getting any more mRNA potions injected into you, or if you trust any United States Government agencies *at all*.
One last time: No person smart enough to live outside a group-home setting can look at the FDA saying, “You don’t get to see how safe or unsafe these chemicals actually are, suckas,” and read anything from it besides “They’re hiding a horror show” unless something has jammed their normal cognitive processes. Something like mass-gaslighting.
TWO: This “vaccine” is a form of purely experimental technology. Nothing like it has ever been used on humans before.
While Donald Trump was still the U.S. president and aiming to get the shots approved for use before a different president could do so and take credit, the media emphasized the precarious aspects of untested injections, but immediately reversed the narrative after the January 2021 inauguration of Joe Biden, Junior.
The subsequent worldwide “vaccination” campaign was, and remains, the (uncontrolled) experiment. And if you know what was in just the Pfizer “clinical trial” documents, you can see the direct connection between the worst of what the Pfizer team observed and the most common forms of harm catalyzed by the shots. If you don’t know what was in these, but choose to minimize the dangers of the shots anyway, then you’re operating at the level of someone using the Bible to prove the cosmos is 6,000 to 10,000 years old. Sadly, you’re an abject retard when you sink to that level, and, according to sources, unless the common goal among Americans is to submit to being cruelly toyed with, we could use fewer abject retards at the moment (Internet, 2020-2023).
I’ll add something extra that most others are not in a position to consider. Either the ingredients in these untested shots portended a formidable array of predictable potential effects, mostly based on both the likely persistence of the spike protein is distal tissues and highly variable rates of spike-protein antigen production, or everything I learned at Dartmouth Medical School—and researched in the years since, as when writing for Sciencing.com (RIP)—was false.
THREE: The cowardice of Peter Hotez and the media serving as his public-relations team again implies one thing and one thing only.
If the above somehow still isn't enough, Peter Hotez refusing to debate anyone about any of this despite being a money-driven pig-person and standing to make millions of dollars if correct is yet another nail in the “Despite the obvious, the shots are safe!” coffin, although anyone still needing this evidence to be convinced of the semi-selective extermination event casually underway probably wouldn’t notice if the coffin-nails were being pounded into the sides of their heads.
There is, again, nothing to see here besides the supremely obvious. And Hotez represents the consensus position of the CDC, the media, and everyone playing a role in the not-so-slow-motion culling of the human herd.
FOUR: When valid raw data is accurately analyzed, the resulting numbers are incapable of lying.
Anyone who doesn’t believe the numbers I post needs to have a solid reason for this if they argue with them, but to date, no one has done so. I’ll be devoting a post to distinguishing trustworthy data analysis from data-spinning and other forms of statistical or methodological deception.
Anyone who cannot for now accept the scale of the debility and death caused by the shots is primarily seeking to avoid pondering the inescapable implication: That the shots are a weapon in a mass-murder campaign disguised as “merely” a worldwide hyper-profitable scam and public-health disaster. That’s right; greed combined with neglect or “mistakes” is actually the front the makers of this poison want people to see, given the far more unpalatable reality. The people behind this quasi-metastatic gore all knew from the “clinical trials” what would happen and they pushed the shots on everyone alive anyway, even babies.
These are some uncommonly psychotic and ripe potential sniper-targets, and if I’m still having a hard time admitting how bad they are, I can appreciate why people who actually enjoy being alive are struggling with the same thing. We’ve all heard of Adolf Hitler, but he’s supposed to been a lone figure consigned to history books, not an example of the sort of person who strolls among us wherever we live and breathe and still has the power to get away with genocide or democide.
It is nevertheless probably not helpful for us to pretend that this is untrue:
Ditto this:
I’ll stop here because otherwise I’ll have dragged the whole production too far from general principles and too deep into specific harms, and that can wait. But I hope that even those of you who are pretending I’m off-base here can understand why, given my unwavering convictions, I am more furious than I expected I would be at my letter to the Boulder County Board of Health being ignored by the mouth-breathing Wokish equity-slut serving as the malign and disfigured executive director of the county health department, Lexi Bambas Nolen, along with the retards and cowards who occupy that board, including Morgan McMillan, Lindsay Fagan, Brooke Harrison, Gregg Thomas, and Lindy Hinman.
With a local election looming and much public capering scheduled for the next few months, I will find a way to make each of these human piss-stains regret ever being a part of what they’re a part of, because I’m not the kind of rake who gives up after sending one e-mail and whining about it for a minute, or who cares whatsoever how my persona comes across to a bunch of broken people no matter the power they allegedly wield.