Pro track will remain a sport only degraded perverts can enjoy until reckless liar and child-abuse advocate Nikki Hiltz is gone
The eugenics project dubbed "gender-affirming care" has been too successful, too soon for us to pretend that misguided high-profile supporters of monsters like Hiltz should go unchallenged
Investigative reporter Michael Shellenberger of PUBLIC characterizes “gender-affirming care” as perhaps the most horrific medical scandal in human history. I tend to agree with him, because GAC—despite revealing itself on cursory inspection to be the purposeful, state-sanctioned sterilization of some of society’s “genetically unfit” without even the possibility of the victims giving conscious consent—has been successfully framed by the media and its demented advocates as a therapeutic intervention. This is, in its own horrific way, a supreme public-relations achievement; even the Nazis didn’t bother with such gaslighting nonsense—they just set about eliminating “defectives” in plain sight instead of feigning the roles of progressive interventional psychologists and social workers.
The spate of reporting dubbed The WPATH Files, including the documents Shellenberger et al. relied on for this mortifying but necessary expose’, is available for free and in full at Environmental Progress. Here’s a sample of the authors’ own summary:
The files provide clear evidence that doctors and therapists are aware they are offering minors life-changing treatments they cannot fully understand. WPATH members know that puberty blockers, hormones, and surgeries will cause infertility and other complications, including cancer and pelvic floor dysfunction. Yet they consider life-altering medical interventions for young patients, including vaginoplasty for a 14-year-old and hormones for a developmentally delayed 13-year-old.
The WPATH Files also show how far medical experiments in gender medicine have gone, with discussions about surgeons performing “nullification” and other extreme body modification procedures to create body types that do not exist in nature.
A growing number of medical and psychiatric professionals say the promotion of pseudoscientific surgical and hormonal experiments is a global medical scandal that compares to major incidents of medical malpractice in history, such as lobotomies and ovariotomies.
Bear in mind as you absorb the scale and unprecedented perversion at work here that the mentally ill man in a U.S. Navy dress currently serving as the country’s Assistant Secretary for Health1 is deploying federal agents to hector physicians who call out the catastrophic GEC lunacy for what it is. The government is intent on sterilizing children—and specific “kinds” of children, at that.
Between the morose and angry red stubs of his hacked-off genitalia and his madly winking bunghole, Rachel Levine now presumably possesses some kind of pseudo-vaginal stench-trench. This is also what he wants for America’s vulnerable children, and he’s willing to use federal law enforcement to preserve the madness.
Use your eyes and ears, folks. This guy is terribly amiss in the head, essentially a sadist who hates himself and wants to exact revenge by sexually and psychologically crippling a whole generation of kids. The same goes for any trans activist recommending GAC for children.
More broadly, there’s no question why things like these are happening; every strange and disruptive new policy magically rammed down Americans’ throats lately harmonizes in some small or obvious way with the same societal reformation envisioned by “transhumanists” at the World Economic Forum—low birth rates, especially among “whites,” and ultimately reducing the Earth’s human population by at least 90 percent. Some of you aren’t “there” yet, but everyone I know is moving in the direction of common reality, some of them in tiny, halting steps and with fearsome programmed resistance to the idea that we are not each other's enemies—our own government is our common and only substantial foe.
When American track athlete Nikki Hiltz—who calls herself “nonbinary,” holds the U.S. outdoor record for the women’s one-mile run and, though manifesting every sign of exogenous androgen administration, is clearly female—complains that evil actors who she invariably labels Republicans are trying to prevent kids from getting the care they need, she’s talking about not just politicians but people like Shellenberger, who like me (if I remember his on-video statements correctly) has never been a Republican voter. She’s talking about people who are trying to convey to the blinkered public that pro-sterilization loonies like Hiltz are the dangerous ones, loudly trumpeting anti-humanistic messages while getting near-universal support for her blathering from within the running “community.”
Hiltz has also established herself as not merely a purveyor of not merely misinformation (i.e., bullshit, intentionally slung or otherwise) but disinformation (i.e., intentional lying). Nearly two weeks ago in this space, I remarked that Hiltz was pushing a false story about a “nonbinary” girl being murdered by her classmates.
I find little consolation in the fact that the death a 16-year-old girl was the result of suicide rather than external violence. There may not be a single instance of teen suicide in American history that didn’t involve some level of real or perceived bullying or excoriating form of personally directed rejection. But it’s important to defend reality itself against delusional and contemptible windbags like Hiltz, who invariably portray “trans kids” who suffer palpable harm or death as victims of others’ hate when most of the time it’s self-hatred that derogates, denigrates, or ends their lives.
Whether Hiltz was consciously lying was unknown at the time, even if she has clearly demonstrated that she is unconcerned with facts (not quite the same thing). But after a single X user had both the nerve and the wisdom to challenge Hiltz, she and everyone else “present” simply ignored this challenge. Nikki Hiltz isn’t just a dummy riding a considerable and irresistible monetary grift; she’s a disgusting human being. Her presence by itself leaves pro track and field something only a pervert could consciously support, although there are multiple other less-malign reasons to reach the same conclusion about this sport and the dingbats and self-stroking sellouts responsible for 95 percent of its coverage.
So, Nikki Hiltz is both a shameless liar and someone who for whatever dark reason thinks kids should be channeled into lifetimes of no-orgasm infertility. And like all “social justice” advocates, she agitates on behalf of objectively damaging policies and norms while seeking to enforce the propagation of her philosophies by silencing her critics.
Hiltz goes about enforcing the growing array of bruises, knife-marks, and volcanic, pus-weeping megaboils on the sport’s public face the same way that every anti-science, anti-speech goon does—by getting the “misgendering” of herself and other “nonbinary” or “trans” people classified as hate speech by social-media companies and seducing high-profile allies to underwrite this mass-gaslighting. She’s also unapologetically hypocritical, ignoring events that upend “liberal” social theories and correspondingly exaggerating or inventing crimes against members of the various dilapidated Wokish tribes.
And even when women running alone are being attacked and killed, with the assurance of more such events happening whether or not Democrats continue to publicly condone and hence invite such attacks. Hiltz, naturally, is among the many high-profile female American distance runners who to my knowledge has made no public comments about the rape-murder of Laken Riley.
Though a full-throated attention whore, Hiltz couldn’t be a fringe figure even if she wanted to be, given that she holds a national track record. But, allowing for the fact that very few people care about distance running and especially women’s distance running, Hiltz has become a corporate mega-darling specifically because she’s a liar, pushes deeply pathological ideas, is pro-censorship, and seeks to normalize all of this nonsense at every opportunity.
Hiltz thinks it’s positively hilarious that distance running has been warped to suit her full-bore psychopathologies, and others go right along with it because integrity-averse, paid-off pundits like Chris Chavez would rather have an openly dishonorable career as a professional distance-running fan than admit he’s co-signing trash and do something with his genuine passion for sports he can be proud of one day.
Even Letsrun has proven useless when it comes to resisting these solecisms. The first day I noticed a Letsrun article had used “them” and “they” to describe Hiltz marked a public turning point of sorts, but the site’s owners had long been pruning the board on the sly. The Johnsons have been on board with the onslaught of Afroglutton-fabulistas and their chief henchpersons, i.e., hound-faced and cognition-starved Millennial white women, since the emergence of these slugs. They do what they need to do to survive, but I feel bad for anyone who feels like their vocational choices in life appear to reduce to “cover a sport like running” and “do nothing.”
Some people seem to think I’ve been too hard on pundits like Kara Goucher, who had not only egged Hiltz on and chortled at her comments about pronoun enforcement, but amplified Alison Desir’s fabricated accounts of anti-black racism within the running “community.”
Really? If I had 100,000 online followers and started confidently blaring on about PMS being a myth and menstrual periods having zero effect whatsoever on athletic performance, would I be given a pass for any stupidities I ejaculated if I said. “Well, how the hell would I know?” I mean jeez, right? We’re all just trying to contribute opinions here.
More to the point, and as I implied in a recent post, it’s okay to restrain your own opinionating when you know you don’t know what you’re talking about—not only even when you’re running-famous, but especially when you’re running-famous. (It’s admittedly somewhat consoling that “running-famous” translates to “completely off the radar of serious sports fans and everyone else who balks at the sight of whining liars, be they emaciated or grossly overfed.” But unfortunately, every c. 2024 subculture has the same basic problem that distance running does.)
In contrast to my critics both public and private, I don’t think I’ve been nearly hard enough on retards like Goucher. But why bother? Distance running, as both a sporting enterprise and a cultural phenomenon, is now aflame and for practical purposes devoid of all traces of basic honor, having become the property of fairness- and reality-poisoning entities—cheaters, racists, dopers, science-haters, viciously unappealing narcissists, and misogynistic sexual rejects flying the banner of man-hating feminism (and fooling no one). All of this might not matter if not for running’s fan base having become a mob of affluent, no-information NPCs who, thanks to confusion, cowardice, or both, help fan the flames of this incineration by agreeing with whoever has the most social-media followers and whose profiles boast the most Wokish icons and emojis.
David and Megan Roche have also been unconditional supporters of anti-human transgender lunacies, and they’ve had a small army of low-wattage, low-testosterone dirtbags running online interference for them all along, hectoring normies in comment sections and elsewhere but ultimately dodging their direct critics.
Sam Robinson is the perfect example of a vocal Roche supporter who, if he had any brains or humility, would be tripping over himself these days to apologize for things he’s said. But because supporters of the Roches are by definition pussies and imbeciles, that will never happen, not that I want to hear from degraded bozos like this guy.
Here’s something Robinson wrote in reply to a post on Ultramarathon Podcast (RIP) over three years ago. with a few minor edits from me:
This is perfectly iconic contribution from a standard Wokeblown intellect completely unaware of its own glaring self-contradictions, or perhaps unconcerned about these conflicts because only feelings matter.
Robinson is a fan of the nonexistent term “nonbinary.” In August 2021, he contributed a comment to a post I wrote about soccer player Rebecca Quinn, but then deleted it (a different commenter preserved his words). Yet he, not me, introduced the term “manly” to describe things like rules, facts, and basic honesty. And despite claiming (falsely) that I’d been writing the same tiresome things for six years despite full-blown “social justice” movements being brand-new in 2020, Robinson had apparently been reading my allegedly identical and off-putting posts the entire time, even if he clearly didn’t understand anything important.
Now, all of this is in many ways moot, because Robinson is a product of his times and the woman who is now his wife is a harried boilerplate product of a quasi-academic “social justice” program. Sam Robinson was eventually going to adopt the positions he did even if he could see through them if he wanted to regularly get laid.
And who knows, maybe there really is an unspoken obligation within long-distance trail running in particular to emit as many anti-masculine vibes as possible.
If I’m mistaken about any of these things, or maybe just too uptight to enjoy cool things other people are plainly into, I guess I’ll eventually find out. But in the meantime, the sane should vehemently reject this version of track and field (including its road-race extension) along with any environment where lying, scamming, pro-perversion imbeciles like Hiltz are not merely tolerated but lionized and shielded from criticism.
I recommend that those with Twitter/X access watch the film The War on Children produced by Robby Starbuck. It’s supposed to cost $11.99 to watch these days, but this link still works for free viewing.
This long and thoughtful post by Daniel D about accepting difficult conclusions about what really animates and guides the world’s leaders and systems of control is worth a read, too.
More than once, I have misidentified Levine as the head of U.S. Health and Human Services, when in fact he is second-in-command at HHS.