Self-parodic anti-free-speech grifter Alex Berenson proudly takes another messy dump on his keyboard

This intellectual fraudster's relentless fact-free hysterics arise from a cocktail of genuine rollicking stupidity and punching upward for attention and greenbacks

Two weeks ago today, I published a post pointing out that two popular Substackers were propagating claims about the October 7 anti-Zionist insurrection by Palestinians in southwestern Israel that were either demonstrably false or evidence-free. I linked to a video by The Grayzone—a brave and nearly unimpeachable journalistic operation with print and video content most Americans are too brainwashed to consider merely viewing, let alone following—that categorically dismantled the claims of a December 28, 2023 New York Times story amplifying October 7-based propaganda that was percolating from Zionist sources in both Israel and especially Zio-purulent boils erupting in various points in the United States, primarily New York City and Washington. D.C.

I intended to portray Alex Berenson as the more generally unreliable of these two lie-spreaders, in large part because Berenson not only amplified Jeffrey Gettleman’s December 28 New York Times falsehoods but specifically praised Gettleman’s overall reliability despite Gettleman’s repeated exposures as a shameless fabulist all over Africa.

It’s critical to bear in mind, always, that Zionists like Gettleman—whether incubated in Israel or the United States—are the lowliest human beings on the face of the Earth, now or ever, closely approximating special-needs, mega-plundering Nazis on crystal meth. Sensible people stopped debating this point decades ago, so please don’t argue with this unless you want to present as a wild-eyed, murderous, worthless cunt, the hapless jabbering archetype of this class of course being Ziomidget Ben Shapiro.

Last week, Berenson, if nothing else, indeed lived up to the billing of a progressively unraveling moron and freewheeling prevaricator.

This single outburst is sufficient to confirm what a dunce Alex Berenson is even in the minds of those unfamiliar with either covid or Berenson himself. Here you see a man simultaneously claiming he believes something exists that can kill people but can’t cause significant blips in overall mortality, as well as accusing anyone with a different conclusion of not merely being wrong by lying. And if Berenson were not such a woebegone pecker-tugging melonhead, he might understand that “lying and/or using made-up datasets” can be replaced by a single word: “lying.”

Whatever else is happening here, Steve Kirsch, an experienced data analyst with two degrees from M.I.T., and Bret Weinstein, a trained microbiologist, are not lying. The covid-jabs-mortality numbers these two have produced or cite might not be accurate to the corpse, and they may be off by ten percent or more; both men acknowledge the limitations of the data they’re able to acquire for analysis. It is impossible, however, for any serious and learned person—and Berenson is the opposite of both—to assert with a straight face that their efforts are insincere.

Kirsch has repeatedly invited the entire world to review and independently analyze his datasets, while Weinstein recently sat down with Tucker Carlson and explained the microbiological underpinnings for the grave concerns Weinstein has harbored about the jabs since or before their early-2021 U.S. rollout.

Berenson’s specific point of rowdy contention with Kirsch and Weinstein is the claim that the covid shots have killed 17 million people worldwide, a number extrapolated from a recent leaking (leakage? Leakery?) of official New Zealand health data and comporting with one or two other pre-N.Z.-leak analyses.

Maybe this number is too high, perhaps even by a factor of two; even if so, we’re* talking about a serious and ongoing crime against humanity. Hell, maybe no one has died at all from the “vaccines.”

One of Berenson’s many problems is that sources he claims mirror his claims in fact do no such thing. Like this:

A visit to the linked piece by eugyppius, a delightful Substack writer and covid-policy-basher based in Germany, leads to the finding that eugyppius prefers in this case to defer to the judgment of statistician William Briggs. eugyppius himself does disagree with Kirsch’s excess-mortality totals, but does not knock down or even attempt to knock down Kirsch’s argument in the manner Berenson suggests. Since Berenson didn’t even quote from eugyppius’ piece, he probably did not and could not rerad it for meaningful comprehension.

Briggs’ analysis of Kirsch’s claims demonstrates that he doesn’t know enough about medicine to be confident in his conclusions. In short, he may be good with numbers but he’s out of his league here. These passages most strongly exemplify his short-sightedness:

If shots were killing some people more or less right away, we’d expect a bump close to the shot day.

Again, if the shots were killing people, we might expect them to die soon thereafter (in this short-window dataset), especially if they were young and hadn’t had some immunity to shots

Weinstein explains some of the reasons this is incorrect (or, to be fair, very woefully incomplete) in his appearance with Carlson. The largest problem appears to be the range and durability of the lipid droplets serving as the mRNA delivery vehicle; these were advertised as rapidly degrading and never traveling beyond the injection site, and both claims—surprise!—turned out to be absolute bunk.

And anyone who follows The Ethical Skeptic, whose conclusions are solely drawn from, and relate to, U.S. mortality and covid data, knows that the U.S. Government has been attempting to obscure the causes of thousands of American demises by indefinitely delaying the assigning of an official underlying cause of death (UCoD).

Was any of this foreseeable? Sure, but anyone with a medical license who openly speculated about this during the rollout quickly found themselves jobless and sometimes stripped of medical credentials. Nevertheless, htere were plenty of signs that this trend—a wave of people dying from the jabs in the short term, followed by an increase in mortality of unknown temporal bound from a variety of diseases—would in fact emerge. In a Clusterfuck Nation post on July 21, 2021, James Howard Kunstler described a conversation with a physician friend:

How much are they squelching the actual numbers of deaths directly related to the vaccines? A savvy correspondent with a medical license writes:

“…the rate of reporting [adverse reactions] to the VAERS system in the US and Europe is very poor: somewhere between 1 and ten percent of actual events being reported. This obviously means that the actual death rate is likely much higher. So, I would not be surprised if the real number of ‘vax’ induced deaths in the US is in the range of 100,000 or more, much more. This is very reasonable when you take into account the shockingly frequent effects involving myocardial inflammation and blood clotting. Both of these pathologic processes logically stem from inflammation stimulated by massive production of the S1 spike protein by the injected mRNA. The S1 spike protein, as you know, is the inflammation-inducing toxin in Covid infections. There was a major fuck-up by focusing on stimulating the production of S1; they, the PTB researchers, thought that the S1 protein was just a marker for SARs-COV, not the pathogenic toxin. In my opinion, most of the deaths from the mRNA ‘vax’ are going to take much longer via long-term inflammatory damage to the vascular system (including heart tissue, brain blood vessels, etc.). Of course, they will deny that such deaths are related to the ‘vax’ given the time distance from the injection. Too many people, making too much money from the mRNA shot….”

Also, this statement by Briggs is confusing from both medical and mathematical standpoints:

The earliest shot date was 30 April 2021, and the latest was 1 October 2023. The earliest death date was 11 May 2021, and the last was 7 October 2023. Which means this is a very limited set of data: only two and a half years. All long term signals, of any kind, will not be here.

I don’t care what Briggs or anyone else considers “long-term,” but he seems to be claiming that all data less than two and a half years old is valueless. That’s not helpful.

Kirsch wasn’t happy to be accused of lying, so he did what even a dullard like Berenson knew he would do and offered to debate the matter with serious (charity-aimed) dough at stake. Not surprisingly, Berenson remained in staunch pre-adolescent mode in responding to the challenge.

Also, after being obsessed with Israel for the last couple months of 2023, Berenson hasn’t made a single post about this topic on his Substack since co-signing Jeffrey Gettleman’s lies. Whether this mostly represents a serious lack of focus or mostly the cowardice of a progressively self-immolating propagandist is up to readers to decide.

Given their un-American-ism and the extreme threat they represent to U.S. security, Gettleman, Shapiro, and every other Ziopathic infiltrator active within American borders who holds Israeli citizenship—and yes, “within American borders” includes subterranean and subsynagoguean tunnels—should be given a one-way ticket to Ben Gurion Airport (while it lasts) and barred from ever again re-entering the United States (ditto). I just don’t think it’s wise to have a bunch of brainwashed, smug, infinitely funded de facto terrorists scuttling around censoring and canceling people while burying the entire citizenry in their limitless psychotic propaganda and demanding U.S. taxpayers fund the bombing of yet more already destitute and desperate Arabs all over the Middle East.