The CDC admits that the "vaccinated" are more likely to get covid while advising people to get yet another untested booster
When the government stops trying to fool people into doing its bidding, it's a sign that force is on the way
I like to start C-19 posts by reminding readers that there was nothing good about the covid jabs for anyone who received them. The harm outweighed the benefits in literally every single human who was injected with the mRNA sauce. Although at the moment, the shots have negatively affected the health of “only” about one in six people and killed “only” around 1 in 1,000 recipients, the risk-benefit analysis takes less than half a second, because when there is zero benefit, any level of risk is too much risk.
I also like to point out that anyone who rejects this idea because they either cannot understand or refuse to entertain the underlying (simple) math is precisely like a biblical creationist who refuses to accept that the universe is ~13.8 billion years old (because they think that concepts such as “dark matter,” the Doppler effect, and the Hubble constant are as made-up as the events described in the Book of Genesis) and also doesn’t believe that the Earth is around 4.54 billion years old (because they don’t trust the process of radioisotope dating—which, thanks to elements with extremely low empirically determined rates of “decay,” such as the conversion of potassium-40 into argon-40, has established meteorites already had an Earth to crash into 4.5 billion years ago).
Lots of people I know accept the age of the universe and the Earth without having investigated their theoretical-empirical underpinnings at all. Why? Maybe because they’re atheists who automatically trust not so much physicists but anyone who appears to be denying the existence of deities (and cosmology, incidentally, is as silent on this question as everything else is; “the Big Bang” is not understood to be “the beginning of time”). And since atheists as a rule trust people who claim to stand for “The Science”—even, as it happens, well after it’s clear these people are either lying or wrong—the overlap between cosmology-accepters and jabs-damage-deniers is significant, if not absolute.
As a result, it’s been a trip—a bad one, obviously—to see many, maybe most, of these same people deny the damage of the “vaccines” in ways just as petty, sniveling, as petulant as the most ardent born-again street-corner preacher. And this is despite a wealth of empirical evidence; nothing about these calculations are theoretical. Anyone who claims these figures are wrong without investigating the calculations is not just an idiot but a likely menace to others.
And no one is yet willing to take a stab at falsifying any of Steve Kirsch’s calculations (and he’s hardly alone with such figures). Most people instead just use Wikipedia to “confirm” that Kirsch a misinformation spreader and use this as an excuse to pretend this invalidates his work. This is blatantly retarded, and I cringe at the reality that we all engage in creationist-like reasoning about something, although preferably we limit this cognitive shambling to less-important areas of life such as running pipe-dreams framed as realistic goals and the objective cuteness of our goofy-looking, booger-eating kids.
Also, if you hear someone claiming that the mRNA potions saved the lives of hospitalized patients with severe illness, that person is either lying or ignorant. There are various reasons for this, but the main one is that the pool of hospitalized people who got the jabs and the pool who didn’t are vastly different: People with especially severe illness (that is, already closer to dying) weren’t jabbed nearly as often as those with less severe illness (that is, likely to recover no matter what), producing the spurious appearance of a higher mortality rate in the non-jabbed.
And this doesn’t even account for the comparison being frivolous to begin with, because they number of people harmed or killed by the jabs is still rising, while even the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) continues to call them safe and effective. In essence, anyone who says that the shots have saved more lived than they have wrecked to some extent or terminated outright is making the claim that A is greater than B, despite not knowing the value of either A or B and the fact that B is steadily increasing over time. A person using this kind of reasoning would have difficulty passing a standardized math test designed for American sixth-graders (or South Korean or Chinese first-graders).
Maybe this is why the CDC is casually employing the following syllogism in advance of a new set of untested jabs being rolled out:
If you don’t like this translation despite its unimpeachable accuracy, here are the CDC’s own words on the newest variant, which only the terminally hapless would worry about even if the CDC claimed it was especially pernicious (that lie is coming soon about a different variant):
BA.2.86 may be more capable of causing infection in people who have previously had COVID-19 or who have received COVID-19 vaccines.
So if you were already jabbed, or you already had covid (which, if you were jabbed, you obviously did, probably twice), you’re more likely to be at risk from BA.2.86. And you’re supposed to believe that despite the previous experimental shots undeniably being something far worse than a mere public health disaster—and despite the CDC’s own admission this round of jabs hasn’t been studied, which I suppose is a step forward from its blatant lie about earlier jabs being tested for both safety and efficacy—the orders to load up on poisons to line the pockets of pharma executives continues.
Scientists are evaluating the effectiveness of the forthcoming, updated COVID-19 vaccine. CDC’s current assessment is that this updated vaccine will be effective at reducing severe disease and hospitalization.
For those with dismal memories, here’s what the media were reporting about the first jabs most of us got:
I seriously wonder how anyone could look at that headline, discount what their own eyes have told them in the past two and a half years, and tell themselves, “Yeah, with this track record of accuracy and integrity, pump another load of danger-gel into me. Maybe I can finally stroke out and make even more sense on Twitter.”
The CDC page continues:
At this point, there is no evidence that this variant is causing more severe illness. That assessment may change as additional scientific data are developed. CDC will share more as we know more.
The main covid-19 CDC page, meanwhile, remains defiant in its unapologetic disinformation-mongering:
This seems like the perfect time for yet another study advertising why people should keep themselves and their children far, far away from any of these products. This one is in Frontiers in Immunology. It investigated the immune responses of children in the four weeks after getting a second dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech cytotoxic and histotoxic serum (V2 + 28) to a variety of common bacteria and other non-coronavirus immunogenic entities (heterologous pathogens and Toll-like receptor agonists).
The idea (on paper) was to learn whether the “vaccines” could protect recipients against common pathogenic bacteria in addition to not doing fuck-all to prevent coronavirus infections as well as markedly worsening the covid symptoms of virtually every “vaccinated” person who got covid. Everyone, jabbed or not, has observed this phenomenon in the past thirty or so months: Get jabbed, get sick, then get covid again, especially those who got the “bivalent booster” that was tested on no humans and eight mice.
“Amazingly,” the reaction of these kids’ immune system was exactly the opposite. What the above text translates to is that these children—and the study was small (N = 29 at four weeks; N = 8 at six months)—were less able to fight of staph infections (S. aureus); ear, eye, and sinus infections as well as pneumonia (H. influenza); potentially fatal food poisoning in children, pregnant women and the elderly (L. monocytogenes); and bloody diarrhea, sepsis, and meningitis (E. coli). It’s fair to assume that the immune response to other common bacteria not studied by this team was also blunted.
Now, I think that plenty of people have actually gotten wise to the ineffectiveness of the jabs, even if they have a severely blunted mental response to the statement “they’re also bad for you, bud” and remain convinced, as a loose and ignorance-ravaged group, that the worst demonstrated effect of the shots is a very low incidence of myocarditis in younger males—much like claiming that drinking and driving is a bad idea because you might spill your drink. It’s just that fucking stupid, like everything else in American life.
So, plenty of people are smart enough at this point to know that getting another jab would be useless at best and “mildly” risky at worst. As a result, I don’t think you’ll see an enthusiastic updates of the latest “vaccines” here in the U.S., even if every yammering and decerebrate Karen in Boulder, Colorado will be fighting with their sluggard-faced peers to be first in line.
But—but—many of these same people will still claim that the shots are safe and effective when asked. They won’t have an answer to the question, “Then why aren’t you getting another one, then?” because the answer is already obvious: While plenty of these people are sloppy-to-inept information analysts, many at this point are just simpering fucking cowards. Not being on information-censoring, lie-spreading sites such as Facebook and awash in their ponderous Boomer-rich armies of screeching mental midgets is helpful in overcoming this.
Regardless, the drug companies and the U.S. Government will not tolerate overly low profits for long, and the government is clearly planning another “pandemic” in the service of staging another bullshit election. The last one was obviously bitched up, and anyone still on Team Bribery/Dementia who has been trained by mass-media faggots to take umbrage at the very notion of an illegitimate 2020 election should recall that every Democrat from ubercunt Hillary Clinton on down denied the results of the 2016 election by inventing a story about Russian interference that these same assholes still refuse to admit was a shameless and massive hoax.
So, mandates will come, and this time they will be tied to people’s ability to make purchases, even online. I can’t see how this shit is going anywhere else. Team Bribery/Dementia isn’t even courting voters anymore; the White House response to the “accident” in Maui was the most shamelessly disgusting “fuck you, little people” episode from an American president I have ever seen, and if President Joe Biden, Junior falls down during a public appearance so that everyone (including his adulterous, drunken slut of a wife) can see his misshapen head explode like rotten kumquat, this schadenfreude will be the closest thing to redemption people from Lahaina, and a lot of people cheering this hilarity on from the mainland, will ever get.
[Note: This post has been updated to correct the number of people in the Frontiers in Immunology paper. 29 subjects were observed at four weeks post-V2, not 8, the latter being the number observed at six months post-V2.]
(Social share photo: CDC Director Mandy Cohen, who needs to choke on a dick—rubber, equine, or human—and promptly drop dead.)