The CDC held a conference in April that turned into a covid-spreading event, then lied about the data that emerged
A perfect (and perfectly ironic) illustration of the unconditional foolishness of trusting a single word from this agency—obviously its claims, but most of all its advice
This one is pretty simple.
SUMMARY
The CDC hosted its own covid “superspreader” event in April. It then issued a survey to all 1,800 or so attendees of the conference, garnering 1,443 responses (a seemingly low reply rate of 80 percent).
A month later, the CDC issued a report stating that 181 people had reported testing positive for the virus, a rate of 13 percent (181/1,443 = 0.1254). The agency also reported that 1,435 of the respondents, or 99.4 percent, had been vaccinated, and that no one had been hospitalized as a result.
As a recent Freedom of Information Act request has revealed, these were lies. The true number of positive tests was 183. Omitting two cases may not seem like a big deal, but the CDC didn’t reveal in its May report that 601 of the 1,443 survey respondents didn’t even take a covid test. That means the actual positive-test rate from the survey was 183/(1,443 − 601) = 183/842 = 21.7 percent, about 73 percent higher than what the CDC reported.
Also, one person did in fact go to the hospital. And in a final small but significant insult to everyone who owns either a Rochelle Walensky sex doll (frigid as an igloo, just like the real version) or a hand-sanitizer-scented, Anthony Fauci-shaped vibrator—neither of which remained among eBay’s fastest-moving items by late 2022—none of the eight lonely unvaccinated persons who went to the conference wound up with covid, although there was a 17.6 percent of this happening even if the jabbed and the unjabbed all had the same level of protection from the virus1.
Neither the CDC nor the mainstream media that duly reported its bullshit late-May findings will ever revisit their dishonest or otherwise incorrect claims. Meanwhile, a small but persistent smattering of dullards will continue to contest what I wrote on this blog based on “information” they have retrieved either directly or indirectly from the CDC, including its defiant lie that vaccines are the best way for people to protect themselves from severe infection and death. And everyone will wonder why I occasionally lapse into ripples of borderline contempt for some of my fellow Earth-travelers.
INTIMATE DETAILS
In late April, the ever-more-absurdly-named U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention held a four-day conference at a Crowne Plaza Hotel in Atlanta. Titled “CDC’s Disease Detectives Give First-Hand Accounts from the Front Lines of Public Health,” the event was free and open to the public, with presentations focusing on what the agency called “recent groundbreaking investigations and innovative analyses conducted by EIS officers – better known as CDC’s disease detectives.”
The event was attended by nearly two thousand people. Within a week of its April 27 conclusion, the media were reporting that 35 conference attendees had become infected with the coronavirus. As a full-on propaganda outlet, the Washington Post of course blamed the conference-goers:
Attendees said many people at the gathering did not mask, socially distance or take other precautions that the CDC had recommended earlier in the pandemic.
Amazing, isn’t it? Nothing the CDC has recommended has proven either remotely effective or safe, and the rest of us are the retarded, filth-spreading shitweasels for catching on and doing the opposite of what anyone in the agency suggests.
In late May, the CDC issued a report about the event. In a move that would have been incredible in the pre-gaslighting era, the agency tried to spin the outcome into a win for the jabs: “Nearly every respondent reported receiving at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose, and none of the 181 people who reported testing positive were hospitalized.”
The Washington Post immediately produced a story on the CDC’s reported findings. In the first of the article’s seventeen paragraphs, the reporter repeats the agency’s claim that none of the people who tested positive had been hospitalized. In the fifteenth paragraph, the reporter gets around to mentioning that “More than 99 percent of respondents had at least one dose of a coronavirus vaccine.”
On August 12, the Epoch Times reported on what it had found after obtaining files of the survey data though a FOIA request.
While the CDC said that 181 respondents reported testing positive for COVID-19, that number was actually 183, according to the newly obtained files.
The public health agency also failed to disclose that hundreds of attendees didn't get tested; some 601 attendees who responded to the survey said they didn't get tested for COVID-19, the files show, including 34 who reported experiencing COVID-like symptoms, being ill, or both.
The agency didn't mention that one of the vaccinated people suffered such severe symptoms that they went to the emergency room, according to the newly obtained files.
So, to sum up:
The covid “vaccines” only work in the sense that they leave recipients more likely then others to become infected with covid, more likely to become seriously ill when they do get infected, and more likely to suffer acute and chronic health problems from the material in the shots;
The CDC (like every three-letter U.S. agency) lies about everything, and the media transmits and enhances these lies;
The CDC and the media are still exhorting, and will both soon be demanding, that people accept these mRNA “vaccines” into their systems;
A fair number of ostensibly neurologically intact Americans will elect to have more mRNA garbage injected into their arms and be proud for having done so.
CDC director Mandy Cohen needs to suck that thing on her face into her windpipe and suffocate to death on it, after which her remains can be carefully disposed of atop the nearest already-flaming assortment of truck tires.
In other words, nothing is different.
According to the Poisson distribution, if eight people are chosen at random from a room with a 21.7-percent infection rate, then (0.217)(8) = 1.736 of those eight people should test positive if the “vaccines” are irrelevant to immunity. Since none did, use 0 for the Poisson random variable (x) and 1.736 for the average rate of success (μ) on this page. You’ll find that Probability: P(X=0) - 0.176, or 17.6 percent. Flipped around, this means that there was an 82.4 percent at least one unjabbed person would test positive if their immune systems were the same as those who were “vaccinated” (and in some cases opted for the bivalent booster, a potion tested on eight mice and no humans).