The IPCC and the Gates-Kerry-Gore axis of smug, jet-setting pseudoscience aren't interested in CO2 reduction. They're tyrannical zealots bent on reducing human thriving

The shiniest silver lining of the covid-19 scam was disillusioned citizens digging deep into ingrained institutional mistruths about pharma, 9/11, the Middle East, and the reality of the green agenda

When I first heard about global warming being, in short, largely the result of the advent of the human Industrial Age, this made the same amount of surface sense to me as it probably does to a lot of people. Carbon dioxide can trap heat; an increase in the concentration of this gas in the upper atmosphere—even a tiny percentile nudge—might be enough to lead to the kind of temperature changes and associated sea-level rises climate-modeling scientists were predicting, set against the background of known temperature fluctuations throughout Earth’s pre-industrial human history (e.g., the various “Ice Ages”). Many of these scientists are associated with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which sounds (or once sounded) like a dull but capable bunch of pinheads cooperating on an important and fascinating project from various points on the globe.

I was also easily swayed thanks to normal things I had experienced all my life, even if these didn’t have any direct bearing on whether the combustion of “fossil fuels” leads to global warming. My everyday sensations had long consisted of smelling and often seeing the emissions of motor vehicles and listening to the belching cacophony of hundreds of combustion engines. I’ve seen the same ugly smokestacks spewing inky billowing clouds of aerosolized muck into the sky everyone else has. I saw the coverage of the fallout of the Exxon Valdez and BP spills. Gasoline (petrol, for some of you) stinks and contains carcinogenic materials. Motor oil is unpleasant and sticks to things.

Even if the various industries resulting in these displays somehow resulted in global cooling, I would be happier to live in that alternative, Canada-free world just for the shift in my quotidian sensory experience away from noisy things that stink, promote disease, and leave semi-delible stains. I have also just described most influencers who pose as distance runners.

The fact that there was no real way for a plebe to check anyone’s math on this—or decide what the hell it even meant on the ground for the average worldwide temperature to be rising or falling, given the immense built-in variations owing to seasons and geographical factors—didn’t seem like a major liability thanks to a massive piece I was missing. I couldn’t see what the incentive would be for anyone to make up numbers like these. Sure, a few scientists who hated Big Oil might be able to sweep up some sweet grant money, but who had more incentive—the IPCC or the board members of ExxonMobil?

This view failed to take into account a single unseen variable: the existence of a loose body of wealthy control freaks who needed a plausible plan to force people en masse to behave differently, and to accommodate a lower standard of living, so the control freaks could better keep tabs on the masses while depriving those masses of resources they fully intended to continue using and hoarding among themselves. That sounded a little too unworkable and, well, evil for any meaningful number of people to be coordinating on. Didn’t rich people just hang out on yachts or in the Hamptons, donating to both political parties and not worrying all that much about what the plebs were thinking and saying?

I won’t review here the torrent of factors that have changed my mind in recent years about how the world and its nominal governments and institutions—including and especially science-based institutions—operate. Instead, I’ll invite you to watch a recent video featuring a conversation between Tucker Carlson and the delightful astrophysicist Willie Soon.

A proud insomniac, Soon spent over thirty years at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts (a state that reportedly may soon run out of space for its own residents) before tiring of being censored in certain areas and moving on to his own research enterprises at The Center for Environmental Research and Earth Sciences (CERES).

Soon discusses the likely role in climate changes of fluctuations in sunlight reaching Earth’s surface over extended time scales. Part of this seems to result from perturbations in the enormous 10,000-Gauss magnetic field surrounding the sun, itself no more than an 864,000-mile-wide nuclear fusion reactor—trillions of hydrogen atoms smashing into each other with enough force to create helium atoms in a process likely to expire for want of substrate within perhaps five billion years after the outer limits of the sun expands well beyond Earth’s orbit. Yes, we’re all gonna fuckin’ die anyway, suckas.

“Sunspots” and “solar flares” are the result of differential levels of magnetic flux in the convection zones near the sun’s “surface” (the whole thing is considered a ball of plasma, meaning that matter in this hyper-frenetic state accounts for the overwhelming majority of the solar system’s mass, far more than solids, liquids, or gases). As Soon describes, it makes perfect sense that these known events would have effects on Earth’s temperature.

Soon mentions a second phenomenon affecting the amount of sunlight reaching Earth over time: small disruptions in the planet’s orbital path owing to changing gravitational interactions between Earth and the other planets in the solar system. The planets have widely varying periods of revolution (“years”), and their dynamic spatial interrelationships are complex.

The image below doesn’t show the correct relative sizes of the planets or the correct relative distances between their orbital paths. But apart from that unknown object whizzing around at a crackhead’s pace just outside the orbit of Neptune, it does correctly depict their relative orbital speeds. [Edit: Ah, that object is an internal standard—it has a “year” identical in length to Earth’s.] This appears to apply to the planetary moons shown, too.

So, changes in temperature close to Earth’s surface are the probably a direct result of more (or less) radiant energy from the sun reaching that surface, period, rather than a consequence of more (or less) heat energy being trapped close to Earth’s surface owing to changes in the atmosphere’s gaseous complexion.

The major problem with the explanation Soon prefers—and can back up with research—is that slick but conspicuously ill-bred creatures such as Bill Gates, Al Gore, John Kerry, Greta Thunberg, and others the world should now be widely vilifying as undiluted mealy-mouthed scammers can’t plausibly promote an actionable solution. People can be tricked into a lot of stupid shit, but probably not the idea that humans can affect the sun’s microgranular luminosity or the orbital speeds of the Jovian planets by, say, driving around in electric cars (think of these as roving government-surveillance modules), frying eggs on iPhone screens, and eating insect-based beef substitutes (think of this as fucking disgusting).

Now that it’s common knowledge that these climate initiatives are all driven by the same sociopathically invasive and calamitous puke-encrusted bags of grifting and hubris that in recent years brought us dangerous and ineffective “vaccines,” pointless masking mandates, and destructive lockdowns, it’s very easy to look back on how and why I accepted the CO₂ narrative for a long time, despite having a scientific background giving me a better position than most to question that narrative: I just didn’t realize the kinds of things shitty, super-rich people were dreaming up and putting into play, mainly because they could.

They still can, but they’ll no longer be able to operate without substantial numbers of people noticing and resisting in their real lives, no matter what sort of rigid disinformation-censorship circus the Internet becomes.

Another thing you may have noticed Americans have no effective choice about is who they get to vote for this year for president. The establishment is banning everyone but the badly senile and even more compromised neoconstrostity of an incumbent from running as a Democrat, and at the same time the borg is doing all it can to ensure that low-IQ racist trollop Nikki Haley becomes the Republican nominee. The official history of the United States is a massive mountain of bullshit, from the assassinations of major figures to 9/11 to the entire pharmaceutical industry to Uncle Sam’s role in ensuring that the entire Middle East remains as malignantly volatile a place as possible.

It doesn’t really matter, though, that no sane or democratically electable choices options exist among still-allowed-to-live presidential candidates, because the election itself will be a joke. The U.S. will, in callous disregard for Mother Nature and the ho-zone layer, be in various hot wars and probably requiring masks for any sort of air travel, not that anyone will feel like roving very far throughout a nation whose moribund, totalitarian, homeless-camp character will be broadly evident, flatly undeniable, and still unraveling around the rotten and exposed core of its crippled hoax of a financial system. Many of us will experience migraines and bouts of unconcealed irritation.

We’ll get the president they want us to get, and by that time most people will be too busy scrambling for some sort of cover to give a shit. Hopefully not too many of them die of climate-change-induced heart trouble.