Runner's World's article about a healthy 24-year-old male suffering cardiac arrest and not mentioning the jabs is standard clickbait; the collective response is the most disheartening part

Individual misconceptions are depressing enough, but evidence of the success of the establishment's mass-brainwashing effort is what instills a phenomenal sense of hopelessness in anyone with a clue

Runner’s World ran a story on Tuesday about a 24-year-old male personal trainer who suffered cardiac arrest after running an all-out mile. Fortunately, he’s alive, though he’s probably a solid candidate for further cardiac episodes. According to the article, the guy chose to have a defibrillator implanted in his chest to kick-start his ticker should it quit on him again, an intervention that seems weirdly premature considering the guy’s doctors hadn’t yet diagnosed his underlying problem. He must have great insurance.

You can read the story on archive.ph—where I found a copy created, hmmm, mere minutes ago—instead of on the Runner’s World site by clicking on the image below. Much of the intrepid reporting was based on material from long-trusted sources such as People Magazine (aka The American Journal of Ribaldry for the Neurologically Inert) and the personal trainer’s own Instagram account.

That this article doesn’t mention the word “vaccines” at all is unremarkable; this is one of many things the public is supposed to have gotten used to—radio silence on the part of the media-government brainwashing-complex in the face of urgent, widespread, legitimate questions about the shots. The truly depressing part was looking at the comments on Runner’s World’s Instagram post announcing the release of more clickbait on the demoralized operation’s associated corporate website.

How demoralized? RW isn’t just run by cowards, it’s also the sole property of gibbering, unrepentant wombats hoping to batter its readers into embittered confusion.

I was actually encouraged by the apparent percentage of Instagram commenters noting the suspicious absence of any mention of Factor V, and the number who could cite studies and other resources explaining exactly why this omission was, or should be considered, suspicious. But while the level of awareness is heartening overall, where ignorance does appear, it’s extreme and proportionally disheartening. And it’s worth noting that this guy later turning out to never have been jabbed would change nothing about this or any of my observations in this post; we* need to focus on population-level phenomena, not single episodes.

Much of the pushback against the very idea that the jabs might have wounded this man came from people who obviously believe that they know more than both the “antivaxxers” and the “pro-vaxxers” who were present for this roiling bazaar of misconceptions. These sanguine experts set out to arbitrate the discussion in a generally unified way: Sure, the jabs cause a little bit of myocarditis in a paltry few young males, but it’s heart problems from both covid infections themselves and “long covid” that are the overwhelming culprit in episodes since 2021 such as the one that befell this overly nervous 5:15 miler.

The first thing to notice here is that were Instagram actually intent on banning misinformation, and assigned a perfectly accurate assessment-bot to carry out this task, every commenter making the claim that covid-19 has caused either more cases of myocarditis or worse cases of myocarditis than the shots themselves have caused would be tossed from the platform. So would everyone yammering about the completely made-up phenomenon of long covid. (Some people do take a long time to recover from viral respiratory illness, including the flu and pneumonia. This is completely different from the “long covid” inferno that Fauci, Inc. is responsible for creating and disguising as something else.

What I wrote yesterday about the categorization of countless people jabbed at least once, and in many cases twice, as “unvaccinated” explains a great deal of the confusion among the bozos in the Instagram comment threads.

Think about this again. If you got the two mRNA shots in the “primary series” from Pfizer or Moderna, you were considered unvaccinated until two weeks after your second dose. This means that if you got a jab, got another jab three weeks (Pfizer) or four weeks (Moderna) later, and then wound up in the hospital ten days after that with both active covid and myocarditis (or some other issue unrelated to acute infections from the coronavirus family, you were considered unvaccinated. Anything bad that happened to anyone within five weeks (Pfizer) or six weeks (Moderna) of being jabbed for the first time was considered to have happened to an unvaccinated person.

Thanks for your compliance, America! You got lumped in with the un-poked MAGA faggots who sat in redneck bars throughout “the pandemic” belching boozy clouds of virion-rich breath into each other’s maskless faces and giving the finger to Fauci, the Centers for Disease Control, and preternaturally moronic battalion of Karentastic scolds that have been crawling the nation and Internet looking for dissidents to shame and cancel. In all seriousness, a lot of those people are dead now.

But among the survivors, guess who got covid more often? Guess who has a lot of issues now that the unjabbed don’t? The crowd that accepted “The Science” has paid an enormous price for their incalculable arrogance, gullibility, and continued hubris, while people who genuinely understand science have had more than enough of the entire wackaloon circus.

It’s vital to understand that “long covid” was constructed largely or entirely from a pool of people who had in fact been jabbed. Some of them, in fact, had been jabbed twice when myocarditis, a stroke, hearing problems, or a typically very rare neurological condition struck them, and were scheduled to be considered “fully vaccinated” in anywhere from one to thirteen more days (pending more boosters, obvi). But because of the way the CDC defines “fully vaccinated,” each of these cases of myocarditis (or other problem) could be assigned to the pool consisting of “the unvaccinated.”

And this is not speculative—as my post yesterday indicated, anyone can look up these definitions on the CDC website.

The CDC also links to a study meant to serve as an admission that some minor jabs-associated problems were indeed uncovered over time—in every organ system in the human body, at that. That spiky-protein stuff or whatnot sure does circulate with aplomb for something that, per the CDC and the media, absolutely remains at the injection site and is rapidly metabolized. (Even if you saw blood flash into the syringe when you got jabbed, that’s not evidence of aspiration, i.e., entry of the needle into a blood vessel. Fuck that noise. That’s harmless vaccine dye.)

The rate of myocarditis in males aged 12 to 29, after just the second jab, is given here as 41 in a million, which is 1 in 25,000. Note that this value is explicitly an estimate (but one by experts, so we’re good).

Even a rate of 1 in 25,000 would be unacceptable given the absence of risk of serious consequences to people under 30 from covid-19 alone—especially by the time these injections made the scene the spring of 2021, when the virus variants circulating were weaker than the original and spawning even more immunologically flaccid descendants.

But the results of that joke-analysis are being presented to the public to keep people from digging deeper and finding studies like this one:

2.8 percent is 1 in 35. For any Runner’s World editors rage-reading, 1 in 35 is a considerably greater number than 1 in 25,000 despite how each looks. It’s actually greater by a factor of 714. And note that not only were almost all of the myocarditis victims in this study (N - 777, median age = 37, M/F split = 30.5% men, 69.5% women) female, but their median age was 46.

It looks like the experimental shots just might be bad news for everyone after all. So allowing a watered-down version of the truth about the destructive impact of the jabs on the hearts of younger men into circulation was a good move by the CDC, as it’s proven effective in minimizing awareness of the scope of the real carnage. Ersatz whistleblower Vinay Prasad does much the same thing on his blog.

This selection of yabbering captures the general vibe of the brainwashed: Unconscious self-owns, grammatical infelicities, and smug condescension from positions of thoroughgoing ignorance.

Consider how misplaced any indignation here about others broaching the topic of the shots is. First of all, as laceysadventures notes, the reflexive defensiveness of those still in denial—who usually beat the "antivaxxers" to the first mention of the shots wherever these discussions unfold—is telling in itself.

And second, mentioning the jabs as a possibility in the absence of information about the vic’s “vaccination” status is merely a smart playing of the odds. The overwhelming majority of 24-year-old American men are “vaccinated,” and even most of the imbeciles in these comment threads acknowledge that The Science has admitted to some degree of cardiac problems specifically in young men. The only fools here are the folks who for whatever reason don’t instinctively wonder about the undisclosed details of this unfortunate fellow’s vaccination history.

None of these people would admit that all of their responses and behaviors have been programmed into them and occur almost literally in the absence of thought or anything hearkening of adult-caliber deliberation. They are responding not only with predictable misinformation of their own, but playing a predictable role by mocking and dismissing anyone who says “Uhhhhh guys? You might need to catch yourselves up a little here.”

I'm trying to imagine the reaction that Michael LoRe, who claims to be an establishment journalist and whose opinions are hence disposable on sight, would have were he suddenly ejected into an accurate version of reality from the epistemological liquid-manure tank in which he is perpetually submerged, and into which he himself pisses and defecates. I bet it would hurt, but only for a minute. Someone should encourage him to schedule the trip; he’ll be happy he took it, if only when it’s over.

Meanwhile, saunders_safaris embodies the distressingly common notion that if something isn't killing 100 percent of people exposed to it, then it can’t be dangerous at all. I agree; this is why fentanyl Slurpees and driving drunk at 120 miles an hour should be legal.

In fact, loads more people are dropping dead than ever before, a point I have belabored at least weekly and a reality not one person is even willing to form a non-jabs-related hypothesis to explain, because everyone who has gotten even far enough to be aware of the excess-deaths problem knows it’s coming from the fucking jabs.

I’d bet that almost none of the “lookit them dumb antivaxxers” commenters in the thread are aware of even the existence of the excess-deaths problem, much less the horrific magnitude of said problem. But plenty of others in the thread and elsewhere surely are, and members of this segment of the population remain unwilling in the main to express out loud what they understand inside.

That said, I empathize with anyone who can’t perceive a problem because they aren’t seeing mass graves in the outskirts of the cities and towns they inhabit. It’s difficult for any one person, even when he or she aware of the mortal foulness underway, to gain a sense of the recent sharp increase in deaths, even those befalling younger people. This is because sudden deaths remain an extremely rare event in any one everyday person’s life no matter how high the death rate rises—so far, anyway.

Pretend that you work in sales or otherwise have a large circle of friends and acquaintances, large enough so that someone you know dies unexpectedly in their thirties about every sixteen months. This would be three “oddball” deaths every four years. Were this to increase to one a year, or a new unexpected death every 12 months, you would be unlikely to register this difference. Yet this would represent a 33 percent increase in deaths in your circle of thirtysomethings—instead of seeing 3 every 4 years, you see 4 every 4 years. 4/3 = 1.333…

This is approximately what’s been happening lately with Millennials, and pretty soon, since these are working-age people, it’s going to face-fuck the American economy even more extravagantly than covid-related miseries already have. On a societal scale, a sustained 33-percent increase in deaths would be crippling; even if the itself-insane excess-death-level of “only” 15 to 20 percent that has held steady for around two years fails to relent—and there are no signs of this happening, in fact quite the opposite—then all of those supply-chain and other problems people have been experiencing on a personal level will add up to an effective knockdown blow to the labor force. And many of you will be told a different truth by the media, such as “People are lazy because of climate change, long covid, and gas-stove fumes and don’t feel like working anymore.” Which is true enough of the dead, save for most zombies.

But that can wait until around the end of the year, when many of the scads of Americans currently disabled, per Bureau of Labor Statistics data, go on to join the ranks of the deceased.

Perhaps the most gruesome thing on display in the comment threads is witnessing the normalization of vaccine harm that has suffused the minds of these commenters, reflecting an extremely problematic societal trend. Even the ones who acknowledge that the shots can cause myocarditis (and, unknown to them, turbo-cancers, infertility, strokes, paralysis, and much, much more!) are admitting that they think it was fine that an experimental potion—one tested for all of 97 days before the researchers broke experimental protocol, though almost no one knows that—even this dangerous was shot into millions of people to prevent an illness that was at worst a head cold in healthy people, and conspicuously failed to do even that much.

No one here knows a single healthy person who died from the coronavirus, and we all know people who have been damaged by the shots, in some cases fatally. (I know multiple people reading this who are unquestionably vaccine-injured.) The average covid victim was elderly, with multiple severe comorbidities. And the case counts are wildly unreliable anyway.

Finally, it’s always worth throwing out there that the same people responsible for creating the “vaccines” also created the virus, so really, no matter how any of this is sliced up, standing up for the jabs and the Pfizer and Moderna distribution-and-marketing teams in the mass media is the stance of an arrantly ignorant person far more likely to die in the next N years than those who evaded the covid-19 shots altogether. (I got the “one-and-done” Johnson-and-Johnson jab, itself a macabre mess of side effects that have been far less publicized thanks mainly to the comparative dearth of people who went this route.)

Anyone who gets upset at reading these posts—which people damned well should—ought to start directing their anger at the real source. Imagine the good that could come of such a transformation in citizen convictions. Imagine, also, the far more likely scenario of lighting striking the same runner directly in the back of the balls not once but twice as he completes a five-minute, sixteen second mile.